>>139236 Not only are you technically incorrect all while making an imaginary association, but also you are using not just the word representation incorrectly, you are also trying to imply that a "representation" is somehow more real than an actual girl.
If such is the case then let's make sex robots that are designed with a lab inside of their stomachs for getting pregnant so we can have tube babies (for appearantly no reason at all) and that way get rid of the need for women altogether. I'm sure the world will be a much more peaceful place then because we can agree to fight wars only with robots and then the wealthiest nations could always win in survival of the fittest NWO. Good shit. You're welcome.