>>7707
Not him, but I've done this a few times and never get added back.

1. private videos are less likely to be taken down
2. pseudo-trading. if i have good private vids the other guy with good private vids will add me.

just make an account, upload a decent video and most people will add you

>>7712
upload better videos

>>7749
I wish that this was true, but no matter what I upload, there will always be people who refuse to add me. It's like if I don't happen to have videos of their favorite model up, they'll never accept my request. And even if private videos aren't taken down as often, they still get taken down. Whenever I send a request, I feel like I'm taking a gamble on if they'll even accept or not, AND if they'll accept before the videos I want to see are taken down.

On top of all this, there's the fact that once a video spreads around, it basically becomes worthless as an incentive to get people to accept your request. I understand that everyone would rather have new videos, but if I'm going to be buying videos anyway, I might as well just skip Pornhub and buy all the videos I want myself.

This is why I eventually just gave up on using PH altogether.

>>7750
I've uploaded tons of good videos though. I even have videos where I know I'm the only person with a copy.

>>7335
Could it be pocha2.com?

>>7336
GO HOME WHITE PIGGU

I know the Japs aren't too fond of foreigners, but what makes you say that? I was there for a short time, they didn't seem to mind, at least not to my face anyway. I'm also not a filthy weeaboo, so that may have helped.

>>7719
Yes it's fine unless you're in a night club or a brothel or something simillar

>>7719
You're also not Korean, so as far as they're concerned you do have that going for you.

>>7719
Unless you know the language you really don't want to jump into a niche aspect of a foreign country's sex world.

>>7585
I somewhat empathize. Some guys are just absolutely visually mesmerized by snatch. Personally, I just find nudity less visually compelling than fat being squeezed, pushed, and shaped by clothing.

>>7585
seeing a girl bent over and spreading her legs can be pretty arousing, yes.

>>7422
This really makes me miss having sex with my ex. :C She was about 280 pounds. Also don't worry about it, OP. It's all about technique.

>>7585
Im in the same boat as you I can't stand the sight of genitalia, and I prefer when women are closed. I think part of the reason I like bigger chicks is that they can be naked without me seeing their genitalia . I

>>7585
>>7690
This is going to sound stupid, but I was in the exact same boat too, and then I "trained" myself to like genitalia by reading BBW hentai doujins. It really did work though. The brain begins to associate the mixture of visuals as erection-fuel if you do it often enough. Granted it's still not exactly my favorite part of a woman's body, but in a couple of years I went from being repulsed and horrified by vaginae to fantasizing about puffy vulva and such. It worked well enough for my last girlfriend to tell me I was good in bed.

Wait, Brianna rips people off? I don't think I've heard about that. What kind of experiences have people had with her?

>>7437
Why tf so you say SO instead of gf/fiancee/wife are you just trying to be politically correct? It is so irritating

>>7443
use a text filter addon or something if it triggers you SO much

It's not a fetish. A fetish is defined as being attracted to a non-living object or a nongenital body part. Being attracted to women with a certain body type is not a fetish, it's a preference. It could be argued that being turned on by feeding or stuffing or tight clothes is a fetish, but then again those things are tied in with the body type preference and are not attractions in and of themselves.

As long as you are not forcing or manipulating your partner into doing something they are not comfortable with doing, there's nothing wrong with you, at least in the moral sense. Some people might consider it "wrong" because it's unusual but you would be surprised just how many people have sexual quirks that would be considered unusual. Pretty much every girl I've discussed sex with, fat or skinny, enjoys something that people might consider to be "wrong" or "weird". I have never really discussed sex with men but I'm sure the same thing applies to most of us as well.

Personally I've never cared about fitting in with other people and trying to be a "normal" person, and I've never been ashamed of my sexual preferences or wished they were different. I have never told any girl I've been with what to do with her body or tried to manipulate her into pleasing me sexually, so I have nothing to feel guilty about. And as for the people who do do these things, I don't think the behavior stems from liking fat women, it stems from selfishness and lack of respect for women in general.

Currently my girlfriend is trying to lose weight because of joint pain and not wanting to be out of breath from walking or climbing stairs and things like that, and I fully support her decision and I'm not bothered by it. She worries that I won't be attracted to her if she stops being fat but I always assure her that it's not the case. It's not like porn - if you're with a person for a long time and you genuinely love them, it goes beyond being physical and you will be sexually attracted to them no matter what they look like.

TL;DR There's nothing wrong with you, respect her decisions and don't be an asshole and you won't have anything to feel guilty about.

>>7589
>> if you're with a person for a long time and you genuinely love them, it goes beyond being physical and you will be sexually attracted to them no matter what they look like.

It varies between people, I'm not attracted to my wife when she weights less than 120kg.
I've been there.

>>7589
>>7669

>if you're with a person for a long time and you genuinely love them, it goes beyond being physical and you will be sexually attracted to them no matter what they look like.

This may be true for SOME people, but as a blanket statement about human sexuality, it's at best a polite white lie. People are turned on by what they're turned on by. The heart wants what it wants, the dick and the pussy want what they want, and sometimes the best you can do is try and find a workable compromise. Some people can change that through an effort of will, but many people can't -- it's like telling a depressed person "just cheer up!"

I grew up with the Dan Savage sex advice columns where he made it all seem easy ("if you're honest and communicative with your partner and are willing to try new things, you can have a satisfying sex life no matter how extreme your or their kinks are"), but in real life, it can be a real strain on a relationship. This isn't just the case for horny guys, either. Some women have equally extreme fantasies that put a brake on their ability to connect sexually with their partner.

Some of y'all need some remedial Wittgenstein. "Is it a fetish or a preference?" is one of those endless terminological pseudo-arguments where the actual answer is "it depends on what you mean by fetish and what you mean by preference." I understand why people (especially women) get upset with the term "fetish," because it carries connotations of being dehumanized and objectified. But "preference" has always seemed like a weasel word to me.

I have a "preference" for hamburgers over hot dogs. I'd rather have the hamburger, but I'll eat a hot dog if that's all that's left at the barbecue. But I don't have a "preference" for fat women, I have an exclusive desire. My dick doesn't get hard for anyone under 250 lbs. -- period, full stop, do not pass go -- and anything under 350 is iffy. If you'd rather I not call that a "fetish," fine, I get it, fetish is a harsh word. But pretending it's a "preference" in the same way that some guys prefer blondes to brunettes or short girls to tall girls seems like a dishonest way of pretending that my desire isn't as specific and exclusive as it actually is.

>>7683
>>7682
If it's not full blown pornography and are a bunch of people posting what would be seen as innocent pictures if it wasn't for the thread and the posters, they're probably getting away with it like how 8Chan did when they allowed it back when they tried to be free speech absolutists. Wasn't one of the reasons 8Chan banned them because the pedos kept going over the legal line?

Guys, KC decided on their own to move to lynxchan. Part of the reason they are drowning in CP is because a news site in germany tried to brand them as a right-wing sut site, when in reality, it's just germany's 4chan. So you have people that hate right wingers trying to post CP to make it seem like right-wing = CP, and there's another group of people that hate their new lynxchan setup so much they are doing the same.

Anyway, don't go off on Stephen, he's just a dev, ffs.

>>7686
You are so clearly not a kohl regular or you're intentionally full of shit.

pedo-jacking of threads on kohl is completely permitted, you report it and the thread will still be there 3 or 4 days later, mods don't touch CP unless it's hardcore, they see it as 'chemo' to keep the 'newfags' at bay. Meanwhile you make a black girl thread there it'll be deleted within 30 minutes. If you object to pedo-jacking you'll probably be banned, as many old-bernds have been who objected to it.

The people who run kohl are literal pedos, it's not being raided by people trying to make them look bad.

>>7687
That's just the vibe I got from google translate and some of the stuff I've seen said. If I'm wrong I'm wrong, but you're right I certainly only just heard of it. Just the impression I got. I guess I should have said "I read such and such" instead of stating it as fact.