/tits/ - Tits

Hangers, bosoms and knockers

BBW-Chan is supported by simple text or static image ads from a-ads.com.
Please consider whitelisting us in your adblocker if you enjoy your stay!


Mode: Reply
Name
Subject
Message

Max message length: 9999

Files

Max file size: 10.00 MB

Max files: 6

Captcha
E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and postings)

Misc

READ THE *RULES* BEFORE YOU POST!

[ / / ]

Post spamming, simping, racism, opinions and discussions here Anonymous 08/13/2022 (Sat) 05:29:54 Id:38d87e No. 168289
The threads are getting out control. Keep ‘em clean.
>>175833 Sorry, but there cannot be a hybrid between Capitalism and Socialism. They both diametrically opposte one another. Capitalism consolidates ownership to individuals. Socialism consolidates ownership to the working class. The basis of Capitalism is profit accumulation. The basis of Socialism is commodity exchange and workers independence. Capitalism requires a state to enforce its property relations, whereby the working classes are the subject of the state. The socialist state, on the other hand, is run by the working class itself and its two purposes is to represent itself (the working class) and to protect itself from counter-revolutionaries (otherwise opposing countries could run an invasion because a society whose state was most recently debilitated is the perfect time and place to invade). We could attempt to revert back to the less harsh Capitalism we had during the days of our vibrant middle class, but fundamentally Capitalism can only ever approach one direction in its evolution. If Dems were to provide all sorts of relief to workers that'd be great, but the same problems will reoccur years down the road.
>>175833 Ignore my typoes, for some reason my keyboard is acting weird, it's annoying as shit
>>175852 Capitalism and Socialism are tools of human beings, used to give ourselves a framework for governance and trade and, in a weird sense, a means of communication with each other. As tools, they can be used and reshaped at our discretion for whatever needs we may have. Some tools are better than others, and some tools are terrible except in certain circumstances. But they're all still tools, and they help us create stable societies with each other. To say otherwise is to give those tools an individuality and immutability to them that they do not deserve. If human beings were to disappear tomorrow, so would Socialism and Communism and Capitalism and everything else we built. Because we won't be around to maintain it, and there are no guarantees that whatever appears after us will do the same thing. They are not inherent to the world, they are not the thing that guides us. We guide them, and we must remember that we have power over our tools.
>>175855 No, that is very very false. Capitalism and Socialism are both systems. Systems are particular structures that have a pattern of doing things. There is such a thing as systems that are unstable. When I say that Capitalism and Socialism are incompatible together, I'm not saying that they exist independent of humans. I'm saying that they conflict with each other as organized structures. I'll use a real life math example of a system and try to keep the math to a minimum. But let's say we have a board of city planners that propose a roadway system, and they hire a mathematician to analyze that system based off of traffic data given by sensors on the roads. What we would actually do in this field is first, create a diagaram and use software tools to help aid any calculations. Then, we describe how traffic in one intersection affects traffic in another (and we set some axioms, basic assumptions about how the system works. Such as all drivers driving the correct direction, etc.). From there we use our software to redefine these relations as a linear combination of vectors, and then this gives us a single matrix that which describes the entire system. Depending on the result of that matrix, it can tell us whether there is something wrong with the system. And it can even tell us what would go wrong if we change some assumptions, such as if we were to shut down a road and that causes the system to become unstable. In such a case the system has an inherent flaw that must be corrected. IWe cannot adapt to that system, instead the system must adapt to us. So this argument that Capitalism and Socialism are "tools" that we can just use differently is not a sound argument.
>>175855 Hell, we are already seeing the internal contradictions of Capitalism materialize. Before, prices (including stock prices) were largely based on the real economy, i.e., production at the macro scale. Some change in import/export policy (e.g., sanctions) would cause a change in prices. Some change in supply/demand would cause a change in prices. And so forth. However, as Capitalism has continued to evolve (nothing is ever constant, after all. All that which is material is subject to change), its need for continued growth has created the development of ficticious capital and even ficticious markets. Now, capital is increasingly becoming detached from the real economy. Prices are becoming increasingly affected by speculation (look at how speculation affects gas prices). It is now completely normal for firms based on ficticious capital/markets to exist, such as hedge funds that essentially gamble money by shorting stock prices for profit -- such as the development and mass investment of cryptocurrency (even fucking NFTs, like holy shit, this is our timeline?). All of that is happening because Capitalists by virtue believe that as long as money moves around, then the economy will be stable. But it does't matter how many billions of dollars you move around if investment continues to drift away from production. The financial crisis' of tomorrow will not only be more frequent, but more impactful as well.
>>175863 How many branches of Socialism are there? How many forms of Communism? Is the Capitalism practiced in the United States the same as the Capitalism practiced in Japan? There are a lot of different ways to use tools. And we are only as limited as our imagination and our need. And considering that these are ideas and not actual objects, we're not even limited by having to use specific constructs and designs. We can change the terms and conditions if we so choose. And please make sense of >We cannot adapt to that system, instead that system must adapt to us Because it sounds like you're agreeing with me that we're in control. That these things aren't immutable concept with fixed structures. That we can change and adjust them at our discretion. Because if we couldn't, there wouldn't be multiple concepts for Communism and Capitalism and Socialism and whatever system/tool of governance human beings come up with. It would be fixed, static, and immutable. The only thing in life that is fixed is that we're all going to die. Everything else is a negotiation. Different ways of doing things. Different tools. But they are all tools. Tools that human beings made and can use at our discretion if we choose so.
>>175866 There are many forms of socialism, but deciding what is best is a debate beyond the scope of this conversation. I got time, but not that kind of time. Now, Capitalism is different across the globe -- but they're generally superficially different and are different, in some cases, only because of different parameters (i.e., given time, they were evolve to the kind of Capitalism we have in the US as well). Either way, ALL capitalist countries heavily exploit labor, some just focus that exploitation on the global south (look up the political situation on conflict minerals. You're going to see many of the nordic economies that liberals salivate for deeply involved in the imperialism for conflict minerals). When I said "We cannot adapt to that system, instead the system must adapt to us" this does not mean we reform the system. The point of my example was that there is something fundamentally flawed about the roadway structure (maybe there are too few roundabouts, maybe there are too few lanes, etc.). With your approach, instead of changing the structure you'd make a superficial change within the structure. So for example, I didn't get into this part but most of the time the kind of matrix I referenced has what's called "free variables", which are variables of the system that do not change. They are not affected by any of the other variables. In other words, the system has fixed aspects that affect the behavior of said system. The same thing applies to Capitalism. Capitalism as a whole is obviously not fixed, but there are several elements of capitalism that are fixed to its structure. What if those are the elements that cause these problems we have? That's why your argument isn't sufficient. Either you need to make a stronger argument or you need to re-eavluate your conclusion.
>>175868 First, "fixed variable" is an oxymoron. You can have a variable or a fixed aspect, but not both. Second, what you're suggesting is that in order to "fix" my argument, I have to play along with terms I didn't know exist, are not mentioned in the general acceptance of Marxism and only exist for you (fixed variables) and only work for you to prove your point? No, I will not argue on those terms. Third, Collective Capitalism as practiced in Japan. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_capitalism The means of production is very much in the hands of the private sector, but it's ignored by the population at large in order to attend to the needs of the many. Technically not a Socialist government, but fairly close. Figure out a way to offset the workload and minimize the amount of resources needed, and there's something workable. Or the Nordic Model https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordic_model Decentralized and going more and more into private hands, but still focused on strong social safety nets and benefits to the workers. No. I will not change my argument to suit your needs. My argument is that we have options because we built the damn thing and we're in control. So unless you can prove that we aren't in control and that this "fixed variables" are actually real, we stop here and call it a day.
>>175868 The only way a change is made superficial is if we make it superficial or do not consider all of the means at our disposal before making changes. But that only comes if we choose to make the change. If we choose to do something. And what is easier to do? Change something that is immutable or has "fixed variables"? Or change something that is mutable and under our control? Are we fighting God, or are we fighting ourselves in all of our finite essence?
>>175874 I-...dude. It's not an oxymoron. Go look it up. Download any free linear algebra textbook and keyword search "free variable". It's a thing lol.
>>175874 How badly in the tunnel are you that you have to argue against the use of "free variable" instead of acknowledging the concept that fixed elements exist within organized structures? Japan is still exploitative, especially in its foreign involvement. And I literally explained to you that the nordic model is incredibly exploitative to the whole global south. This response is so mind-boggling. Even the previous guy that called my ideas dangerous didn't reach this much to make a point. Lord.
>>175874 >My argument is that we have options because we built the damn thing and we're in control. Good luck addressing climate change. We built our industrialized economy the way it is. So we're totally in control. It's not like companies are the main drivers of climate change, they dump billions of dollars into climate-denial media and pay major press to mass sell articles shifting the burden of responsibility to the individual (drive less, keep your AC higher, don't use plastic straws, etc.). It's not like the political forces of society ignore scientists who have spent decades pleading for us to make drastic changes in the way we run our economy to save life for our future generations. Scientists definitely get listened to and taken seriously. It's simple, just change the damn thing. WE are in control 100%. LMAO
(84.06 KB 1123x240 Screenshot 2022-09-23 232444.png)
>>175874 And JUST in case you decide not to make an effort to verify that "free variable" is a legitimate term and not some random oxymoron I pulled out of my ass: Here's a screenshot out of one of the textbook sections from my undergrad Now does Capitalism have fixed elements or not? Private property ownership is one such element. Therefore, Capitalism has a fixed element. Honest to God I wouldnt be surprised if you reply and say that Capitalism doesn't require private property rights to exist. I know you want to say it. Say it LOL
>>175878 A Fixed Variable is assumed to be measured without error and consistent in different systems, correct? So in order for the example to work, you'd have to prove that the fixed variable both exists and exists in equal measure in different systems. My point still stands. You are arguing that there are immutable aspects to elements that cannot be changed. Provide proof that it exists and what they are and why they cannot change. To offer this up but not say what they are or why they are immutable gives you an out that put the argument in your favor, no matter what counterargument I may provide. And all of those system, exploitative as they are, still provide for the health and well being of it's citizenry at large. And they are not immune to being changed to better provide for it's citizens and lessen the impact of exploitation. I stand by my argument. >>175881 Are corporations run by computers completely divorced from humanity? Or are they run by human beings. This is not some Hollywood movie with mustache twirling villains. Human beings are running the show, and human beings are finite, malleable, and not held to consistent and equal actions across the majority of our lives. We can improve, we can get worse. But we can and will change. This is not some Hollywood movie where the good guys and bad guys are marked in easy to define details for audience consumption. We are flawed, malleable things struggling to live in a universe that can always wipe us out in one form or another in the blink of an eye or slowly over time. That we have gotten this far is as much about us figuring out a way to make things work as it is blind stupid luck, and we still have time and the ability to change to do so. So yeah. the goal is simple. How we get there may take time and effort, it might take a hail mary freak of nature occurrence, but it can happen and we can get to that goal. Because whether Bourgeoise or Proletariat, still human.
>>175887 Why did you post a formula rather than the definition? Second, private property ownership can be ignored for the sake of the welfare of the whole. Collective Capitalism as practiced in Japan does this. The Nordic model does it as well, just in a different manner. If they were fixed, the welfare state in both models would be as focused on the welfare of the corporation above the worker as it is in America or more oppressive models. And yes, Capitalism does rely on private property rights to exist. But it does not rely on prioritizing the acquisition of capital above all else in order to exist. Strong regulations and a strong welfare state can mitigate the worst aspects of private ownership of the levers of power within an economic system.
>>175874 >A Fixed Variable is assumed to be measured without error and consistent in different systems, correct? No, not correct. Fixed variables may have a margin of error. For example, friction coefficients are fixed variables that have margins of error in physics. >So in order for the example to work, you'd have to prove that the fixed variable both exists and exists in equal measure in different systems. You don't prove that the fixed variable exists because that's a trivial result that comes just by looking at the pivot columns of the matrix. And what do you mean by "exists in equal measure in different systems?" because if you change the system, the free variables will likely change. That's the point.
(113.92 KB 876x1097 Screenshot 2022-09-23 235229.png)
>>175889 >Why did you post a formula rather than the definition? I figured the term was pretty definitional on its own, but that's fine. Here's a simple definition that comes with an example. Notice how in the example, z is called the free variable. Notice that x and y are functions of z, meaning they are affected by the inputs of z. HOWEVER, z as a free variable is not dependent on x or y. z = z, it can take any value possible. So that's the analogy. What if the independent elements of Capitalism, which affect other elements, are actually what causes the problems that affect the other variables? The only way to eliminate that in such a case would be to change the structure of the system instead of changing the dependent variables of the system.
>>175889 >The Nordic model does it as well, just in a different manner. You mean like this manner? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ri20jd4iFk or this? https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2019/12/6/the-dark-side-of-the-nordic-model
>>175896 My point stills stands. The idea of "fixed variables", as presented by you, is that there are aspects of Capitalism that are immutable and consistent, despite appearances to the contrary. You have offered no proof that said fixed variables exists or what those fixed variables are and are trying to muddle the argument. At no point in time did I ever say there weren't negative aspects of any Capitalistic system or imply that any Capitalistic system could work without change in some fashion or that Capitalism is the best system for any economy. Simply that it is a tool that we can change and shape at our discretion. And that we can chose other tools as well to inform how we manage our economies, with the same ability to change and shape it to our will. Either you prove that there are aspects of Capitalism that are immutable and what those immutable aspects are, or concede the point.
>>175889 Private propery ownership is literally fixed to Capitalism.
>>175898 Another element fixed to Capitalism is the profit motive. As the individual owns stake in capital, the individual will at large have a greater motivation for profit than for anything else.
>>175902 And it is ignored for the sake of the public good in Japan, and there are strong social safety nets and a strong welfare state to offset the worst aspects of private property ownership in the Norway model. Just because it's a part of a system does not mean it cannot be changed or discarded by the people in charge. It is not immutable, it is not fixed. Does it mean it's perfect? No. Does it mean we have to follow it to the tee? No. But it's an option, and we need to consider all of our options and make an informed choice when it comes to creating an economic model that works in the interests of the people at large.
>>175905 You are deliberately lying at this point. Japan still has private property. No, it isn't ignored -- it is still enforced. Norway still has private property, and it is still enforced. Also, fuck norway. Try again. Go on.
>>175903 And yes, even profit motive and the pursuit of profit can be regulated for the sake of the public good. That is the point of strong regulations by a governing body. To make sure to keep the pursuit of profit in check so that the pursuit does not dominate the welfare of the citizenry. >>175906 https://www.britannica.com/place/Japan/The-role-of-government Yes, Japan has private property. But despite being a Capitalist country, the government and the workers play a heavy role in how that private property is managed and what is produced and the hours dedicated to said production. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_work_environment Their working conditions are atrocious, but it's not because of a singular pursuit of profit above all driven by the bosses at the expense of the workers. It's rooted in their accepted social norms when it comes to work and the group. And for the bulk of their society, they're participating. And when did Norway not have private property? And when was it not enforced? But yet, with strong regulations and providing a social safety net and welfare, they still are able to provide a strong standard of living to it's population. And yet, they can all change it for something else when possible. No, they are not inherently good. But they are not immutable either. There is nothing to try again. You said that there were fixed variables. You have yet to prove it. Either do so or concede the point.
You know what. Never mind. You win. You get what you want. Enjoy it.
>>175910 Yeah I'm not going to be able to take you seriously here, especially not after thinking that private property ownership and the need for continued growth can be "regulated" Who care's about Japan's billionaire ruling class, anyway, right? There's no winning here, it's actually depressing to me how hopeless you are. For that reason I consider liberals so much worse than conservatives. At least with conservatives I have been successful at getting them to not only concede, but even to adopt radical leftist politics. Not ONCE have I ever been able to do that with a liberal. I don't think I have even experienced a liberal conceding a point. You people are insufferable. You kill grass roots movements with bullshit bureaucracies, you spread misinformation to already confused workers about politics, you perform free PR and remain loyal to businesses and institutions over workers, and most of all you suppress revolutionaries as much as possible. Fuck each and every single one of you.
>>175928 Actually, I'll re-clarify my previous comment to be about radlibs. Regular libs have their issues, but they're muxh more innocent in how they navigate politics. Radlibs, on the other hand, do the shit you did this entire thread.
Site won't let me post. What's R9K mean?
>>176096 It means the site thinks you're posting duplicates of an image or a video.
>>175911 There's no arguing with a zealot.
>>175928 Radical leftists and communists should get a one way ticket to the communist country of their choice. Or if not willing they should be sent to the bottom of the ocean gurgling and panicking never to bother normal people again. They parade around the idea of "workers control" while begging daddy government to do everything for them. They're cowards and leeches who should be wiped off the board in large.
>>176973 It's never real communism in any of those places or it's only socialism. Ask one. Always involves a lot of death and persuasion at the end of a gun in any case. It's OK though because they have the sums right and you don't know what's good for you.
>>175896 >nordic model >no babes in bikinis what the fuck is that shit
>>168291 Thats lilbishmika if I'm correct. She put her tiktok on private. Any good content from her lately?
>>176973 Communism can only be global. In order for society to be communist, currency must be made obsolete everywhere. If currenncy is necessary anywhere else in the world, then it will impose its influence onto whatever communist society that exists. Capitalism also must be made global because it depends on continual growth to sustain itself. Two opposing mode of productions that both need to be made global cannot coexist together. Therefore, there can be no isolated island of Communism in a sea of capitalism -- and vice versa. Death to Capitalism :)
>>177059 why the fuck are you proselytizing about your religion on a porn board?
>>177061 Are you unable to read? It's off topic here.
>>177059 How do you aim to to make it global and how are you going to be able to enforce it? Your reason will not work no matter how many graphs you produce and infighting will occur almost immediately.
>>177066 1. There would need to be an organized effort between Communist organizations all around the globe to pool our resources and efforts together to first and foremost establish a socialist economy. Then, with the pace of capital stabilized as the primary purpose of investment is no longer infinite money accumulation, that means no longer would there be a crisis of overproduction nor a crisis of planned scarcity, which will increasingly, with time, make money obsolete. The goal is ultimately a post-scarce world 2. During socialism enforcement would be bureaucratic and, if necessary, militant (namely if an opposing country tries to invade us to prevent the spread of socialism). 3. Infighting is itself a product of the environment. It isn't this inevitable characteristic of politics. Right now, America is full of infighting because we do not really have any political party that really focuses on class to begin with. Why do you think voting patterns here are so positively correlated to culture and region? To our politicians, demographics is all that matters so they will base their politics around factors of immigration, birth rates, urbanization, etc.. So of course we have a political environment where everybody is so divided on not only their politics, but even their approaches to the same politics. Part of the aim for us Communists is to break that barrier by helping make the working class as conscious of class politics as possible. If a labor party were to crystalize in the US, we'd see the replacement of Democrats who pander to working class urban workers and even the replacement of the GOP among rural, especially poor de-industrialized towns.
I almost wasted my time replying to a socialist (communist)
there couldn't be a sadder place to have a more disjointed debate, you're all pathetic.
>>177579 I don't really come on here to jerk off much, I already have a woman I get to fuck *mostly* whenever I want lmao I think what's realy sad are all the men on this site that are so lonely and sex-starved they are regular customers of OF, chaturbate, etc.. The only reason they're on this site is because they already spend so much money paying for porn or sex services. At least I'm just a lurker on here lmao.
>>177530 Show me a 100 people and I'll show you 100 opinions. It can't work regardless of that thesaurus you just typed.
>>177579 No one's stopping you from fucking off and I might add that you are on here with us. Cooming.
>>177685 It would've costed you fewer words to just say you have no argument lol.
>>177692 Clever commie isn't too bright at all. I'll forgive his reply to Gilda Radner and point out once again that people are individuals, rarely if ever want exactly the same and that does include for a large part authoritarianism. Voluntary agreement in the proportion you require isn't likely and if you generate those numbers you'll only maintain your system by force over those that won't. Historically it falls down eventually if you get to your destination of utopia of not. You could liquidate your oposition I suppose but that would include absolutely anyone that doesn't fall in line 100%. That ego of yours won't tolerate any less but there are bigger bastards our there. A more physically able comrade will have your body fertilizing a workers farm before you know it you counter revolutionary you. Up the workers! Now vomit me some more propaganda. Do keep it simple for me though. I don't think too good but do remember I'm not here to defend my position. I'm here to attack yours and by any means neccessary as I'm sure you understand.
>>177560 That anon is not a Socialist or a Communist. They're the "you wouldn't understand it" meme spouting off "Welcome to Communism" entry level talking points with nothing more nuanced or complicated other than that. I doubt they even know of the different schools of thought about Communism or even care. "Communism" is just something that makes them feel smarter and better than other anons. He's no better than a troll.
>>177696 People may be individuals, but society is a mass union of people. There's no society without the working class collectively pooling their labor together to sustain civilization. Nice try though
Fuck religion, Now r18 is shutting down the biggest asian porn site because of strict payments from all the jews and christian controlling porn censorship
Mastercard and visa is too powerful for modern society
>>177908 You'll figure it out when you're gurgling in a ditch lying next to your imaginary girlfriend, in your che t-shirt and beret.
>>177969 LOL you wish. If push came to shove in real life, I guarantee you that I'd turn you into my little bitch real easy. Folks love to act like they're about that life behind a screen, but in person all that bravado goes out the window. I'm also married, she isn't a girlfriend. Beyond that tho, you're going to be the one that'll figure out a communist uprising is going to be far more than you can imagine handling. Leave it to the police and military that actally have the balls and means to try and shut down a revolution. Stick to LARPING on the internet your fantasifies of killing commies. It's not happening lol. The most you folks do is target random people in public space, like shooting up a grocery store. When you people make political attacks, they are unorganized and misdirected.
>>178483 Communists are pussies who rely on the government to do everything for them. Anyone pushing "communism" ultimately just defers to government control of industry and buisness. And don't sit here in America and act like you're a "tough" communist. There's no such thing here, just fucking scumbag pussies like antifa who gang up on people while in groups and the second someone hits back at them they scream and cry for the police they just spit on. I'd love to meet a communist who thinks they're gonna manhandle me irl. Ammo is expensive but thanks to capitalism I make plenty of money and have plenty of it. Probably sitting there with your little scrawny ass on an iPhone, using the internet complaining about capitalism when everything you have revolves around it. You fucks are pathetic. The only time communism has taken over was when there wasn't an armed population to fight back, thats not America. Get every shit bag commie in this country together and try to make a push and I bet you just my neighborhood is more than armed enough to handle the issue ourselves 🤣
>>178487 Communists are literally anti-government. We want to abolish all forms of state, because the state is an organized, centralized, militarized, and bureacratic organization that is set to enforce the property relations of society. You are a fucking retard for thinking commies are pro-government. That title belongs to liberals and especially conservatives.
>>178487 Also, I would definitely manhandle you in real life lmao. I have 7 years mma experience with about a decent 3 years of wrestling and boxing. I'm also not scrawny. I said long ago in this thread that I'm naturally stocky, I continue being a gym rat anyway. I look more like an athlete than I do an academic, so people get surprised when they find out I'm both. Most likely you're out of shape, even if you aren't fat. You might eat plenty, but I'm willing to bet you poison your body with sugar, you don't actually take in all the vitamins and nutrients you need, you eat typical brands that actually remove fiber to keep you from being full (a symptom of capitalism. It's better to push society to obesity because that means people will buy food products more frequently). You likely work a physically demanding job or a time-consuming job and do not get to really exercise. The majority of other men that could actually take me on would be my peers, the guys that actually professionally fight or are pursuing professional fighting. Not some fucking clueless chud that lives the typical american life and has the typical american diet.
>>178499 You're a weak little faggot like every other commie bitch. Any actual male that wasn't a little soy filled bag of shit would have the spine to just go out and make their own way instead of wanting to leech off of everyone else. And every communist country EVER is completely run by the government, every aspect of society. You fucking retard. That's what communism is, whiny little faggots that don't have the drive or ability to get by on their own want everyone else to provide for them. Then the government steps in and it's a complete take over. That's every time communism has ever happened long stand. You extra chromosome having, large foreheaded fucking retards are never smart enough to learn from history. You can spout whatever nonsense you want about your life story you stole from your favorite mma fanfiction, you're a fucking pussy and you're a weak bitch that wants to live off other people's work. Just go on welfare like the rest of them you human trash. Fuck you and the rest of the commie larpers that would cry like fucking females if they had to go live in an actual communist country and live under the bullshit you retards want. Faggot
(155.78 KB 1000x1000 110222f016f6109340a7552edfd889e8.jpg)
(1.28 MB 280x210 giphy.gif)
So, now it's right wing sales pitches against new age hipsterism in an internet slap fight. Well, at least it's...something.
>>178539 There's nothing really new age about anything I believe. Most of my political beliefs were ideas or based on historical events of class struggle. New age type ideology would be something like post modernism, and these sort of mentalities are always anti-materialist and moreso based on idealism or pessimism.
>>178516 >Any actual male that wasn't a little soy filled bag of shit would have the spine to just go out and make their own way instead of wanting to leech off of everyone else LOL my guy, you clearly didn't read my comments. I'm a data scientist. I code with SQL and R from home. I make like 4 times the median annual income in my entire state. Statistically, I probably make more money than you do. You also just demonstrated that you think Communism is based on sharing income. No, it's based on owning the fruits of your own labor. Yeah, you are always going to be a degenerate.
>>178644 >Most likely you're out of shape, even if you aren't fat. You might eat plenty, but I'm willing to bet you poison your body with sugar, you don't actually take in all the vitamins and nutrients you need, you eat typical brands that actually remove fiber to keep you from being full That is new age hipsterism or classism or whatever you wish. Just call that anon a fat fuck or a fat bastard or whatever. Keep it simple.
>>178653 Can you explain how it is? Because this isn't based on the ideas peoplehave that lead to thinking the substitutes for medicine and diets are essential oils and pseudoscience diet fads that act as a one-size-fits-all. Everything I've said is a legitimate issue and it's caused by money interests. It's materialist, because I'm applying marxist analysis to social problems. >Just call that anon a fat fuck or a fat bastard or whatever. Keep it simple. Yeah but he probably isn't fat lol.
>>178669 Nope. What you were doing was trying to insult a random anon who's been insulting you by listing all of the things you do (that you can't prove) and the things you have (that you can't prove) while using a surface level knowledge of Communism to give it the illusion of depth. It doesn't really matter if what you say is true, because who's really going to listen to the guy bragging about shit they can't prove during an internet slapfight. Just like who's really going to listen to a goon spouting off the latest flavor of conservative talking points when it's clear they're doing it just to feel special and win an internet slap fight. Either way, nobody comes out a winner except the anons laughing at how stupid it gets and whether it can get dumber.
>>178681 First, I do not have surface level understanding of Communism lol. I'm well versed because I'm part of a local branch commie organization that does weekly theory sessions. Second, you're right, of course I can't prove what I am or what I have. Otherwise, I wouldn't be an anon. However, I CAN assume with good confidence that he doesn't have much. Very few people in the world, even in America, actually have high income or a significant amount of capital. I'm also not interested in whoever is reading this convo. I don't really care about spectators. I'm more interested in the person that is actually engaging with me, even if they're a reactionary chud.
>>178483 You embarrassingly misunderstand. I won't have to do anything was what you ignored. One of your brothers possibly you best and closest will remove you. Did you really resort to "I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals.....". What a joke of a man you are.
>>178725 And??? Do you actually think I care that a stranger doesn't believe what I say? Why would I give a shit?
>>178729 You reply.
>>178683 Just like he should assume that you have a high income, a wife, and experience in a combat sport? Based off of what, your ability to form sentences? And the thing about the internet is...you can look stuff up and pretend to know what you're talking about. So at the end of the day, he insulted you, you fired back with "I'm actually really cool," and now this is a shitshow. And the more you go "I don't care" the deeper you dig the hole you're already in. Because now the spectators can shit on you in the same way that the original anon shit on you. And they don't even have to go on a MAGAbot rant.
>>178742 He's become a parody and there's no way back. Best thing he ever did was thinking that anon as physically threatening him and leaping to his own sense of superiority, again.
>>178732 You're replying, too. So what? People have pointless conversations all the time.
>>178742 >And the thing about the internet is...you can look stuff up and pretend to know what you're talking about Not necessarily. That heavily depends on the subject at hand. If it were about say, political science or history, then yes it's easy to just look up answers. That does not apply to higher mathematics. Higher maths involves topics so incredibly niche and abstract that no one could actually convincingly make themselves sound knowledgable UNLESS they rely on plagiariasm, which in that case is easy to confirm. It doesn't help that most resources don't explain what the notation means because they assume you already understand it. Anyone else here who happens to have a math degree could ask me various questions that I cannot just answer based off of google searches. EVEN if one takes full advantage of Google's advanced search capabilities (e.g., filtering by quotes and 'AND'), there are a LOT of mathematical concepts and problems that one simply cannot find on the internet that you can realistically reword well without understanding it. Shit, let's put that to the test. I want you to look up to the best of your abiity an answer and explanation to any of the following: 1) Is the group U(1) isormorphic to the group SO(2)? 2) What is wrong with the permutation 385164927? 3) What function generalizes powers of the imaginary unit i? Good luck googling that.
>>178798 The best way to figure out when someone's rattled you is when you bring up things you say are a part of your life. Like your hobbies, or your relationships...or math. So it really doesn't matter if I look it up. All I have to do is mock you in all of the things that you say matter to you and the second you go into detail about all of those things that make you feel smart or make you feel like you've got something over the people here, I'll know I've "won." Not because I've proved you wrong, not because I'm smarter, but because you got invested enough to respond. And if the comment is really stupid and you respond, then I've "won" even more. Because that's how it works.
>>178805 Why not look it up? I'm not even giving you a time constraint. Go ahead, you can prove me wrong instantly if you're able to just google the answers to those questions. Otherwise, you didn't actually win shit. Immediately, your point that anyone can just look up things to sound well versed in anything is no longer a reliable point.
>>178805 By the way, the whole "I made you respond, haha!" shtick you folks are doing applies to each and every single one of you LOL Just don't respond if you really want that point to be valid. Simple as that.
>>178796 Fake nonchalance. You can't stop yourself. You care.
>>178805 I care in the sense I enjoy internet interactions, but not in the sense that anything you say actually hurts me. Likewise, you, at the very minimum, care enough out of interest.
>>178824 >And??? Do you actually think I care that a stranger doesn't believe what I say? Why would I give a shit? I did not say I didn't and that's not what I'm interested in either. Lol minimum. Seems a lot of effort to make someone capitulate for someone that doesn't care too. It's OK, you can now tell me how little effort it is for you now. I don't want to hurt you either. Please don't judge me by your standards.
>>178826 Still waiting for you to prove that it's easy to fake knowledge via google searches about anything.
>>178832 Wrong person but is this a serious question?
>>178833 It's not a question, it's an act of desperation. There's no point in responding.
>>178897 Desperation? LMAO you are being so dramatic. Well, that settles it. It turns out, the point that expertise can be faked by just google searches is always going to be unsustantiated here
>>178897 I'm guessing that he would ignore the hyperbole of the term anything, then move onto dismantling the concept of knowledge and truth. Possibly by way of re-defining the word fake too. Not now I've mentioned it though. That wouldn't pass.
>>178907 Overall, his goal is to basically present himself as the smartest, coolest guy in the room. He hasn't yet re-defined words to suit his needs, but he will ignore the overall point to focus on anything that will give him justification to mention his math degree or some aspect of his personal life that makes him feel like he's better than anyone here. Even his "communism" is just another excuse to engage in this attention-seeking behavior and need to feel superior. And now he won't leave unless he can prove he "won" and is the smartest and coolest and best-est ever.
>>178915 You're right. But a fake would never work on him being the cleverest man alive.
>>178915 Where exactly have I ignored any overall point? I made arguments explaining in support of Communism -- I only was met with insults about being a commie. You people are the ones that made a political debate become a dick measuring contest. I'd prefer to keep arguing politics, but no one has a real case defending Capitalism nor a real case against Communism.
>>178915 I never even said I'm the smartest or coolesT LMFAO You must be insecure if that's how you took it. And I don't need to prove I won. I already won. You couldn't justify your arguments, and the others could not even attempt to argue how capitalism can be reformed. Instead, they tried attacking my character and became shocked I attacked theirs back. I'm not the smartest guy, you fucking idiots. I wasn't even the best student in my classes, nor was I the most well versed commie in my socialist organization. But one thing is clear: I'md definitely better than pretty much everybody I engaged with in this thread. Cope.
>>178961 I remember the exact time you pulled out your mathematician status and advertised your MMA skills. No one before you did anything of the sort. I can reference if you require but I know you know this so don't start with the gas lighting.
>>178962 How did you win? You didn't convince anyone other than yourself. No one wants to "debate you bro". You could carry on typing forever and we'd still eat a bullet before having anything to do with your political ideas. Reason be damned. Fuck you and fuck off. If you consider that winning then good luck to you.
>>179107 LOL do you know why I brought that up? Because another anon said, and I quote: >Socialists and communists are a disease on humanity and should be thrown from cliffs en masse to rid the world of their weakness. If socialists/communists took over it would be the same as every other time. Societal collapse and authoritian government take over. Socialism is for fucking retards who'd rather cry about fairness than work and another that said >I love reading the musings of complete retards. What have you ever produced, or given to society? Jack shit
>>179108 Sounds like a whole lot of cope LMFAO
>>179107 An anon says socialism is for "retards" so I say I'm a mathematician, which are the last group society would consider retards lol. Then they say its for people who'd rather cry than do real work -- so I bring up the fact that I'm a data scientist. Like I said, I didn't start the dick measuring contest. You and your people did.
>>179161 So if a qualification isn't a measure what is it? >>175426 >It's really wild just how smart communists think they are and how much they think they know about what's best for everyone else. He suggested you were dumb. He didn't say how smart he was. You laid out your qualification. >>175451
>>179160 Rank with failure. Unable to convince anyone on an image board full of incels and virgins. Wow.
>>179353 Ajobt title doesn't measure someone's intelligence, because we don't actually have any criteria or system that can actually define and measure intelligence. What we can say however, is that certain professions absolutely require particular intelligence. I might be stupid when it comes to emotional intelligence, but being a mathematician definitely is a testament to my analytical intelligence. >He suggested you were dumb. He didn't say how smart he was. You laid out your qualification Are you unable to read? Because I said I laid out my qualification as a testament of my intelligence. A person does not pass a 4 year math degree and pass qualifying exams to get into rigorous fields while being stupid.
>>179565 Just take the L. You started dick measuring.
>>179565 so whats the analysis of someone advocating for a system, that every time tried, has failed with horrible results and even after 30+ years, the failures of that system still having an effect on the well being of the country even though the system is no longer in place?
>>180185 If fairness to him he has tried to explain that away. His excuse is the usual one, it not being either true socialism/communism. Outside or inside forces having corrupted it etc etc. He doesn't understand people. He said himself he wasn't emotionally intelligent. He seems to believe it's one big mechanism that should work if it wasn't for those pesky humans. I'll receive an essay on how I'm wrong now but it's all up there for anyone to reference.
>>180185 >>180191 That's the saddest part of it, that socialism/communism has never failed, what you see and saw in those communists states is real socialism/communism in practice. Socialism/communism is death, misery and corruption, a few that reign and live like kings, wanting to dictate every second of your life, while the vast majority of people die of hunger. If you try to oppose the system you will rot in a cell, tortured to death. Nobody can tell me what true socialism or communist is, why?, because I live in a socialist country, I have suffered (suffer) what that system does to its people, you won't like it tho, that utopia doesn't exist, only death remains.
>>180250 Without even the freedom to be anything… and people think governments such as religious regimes are strict and cruel and fail to recognize the stability in many other systems of governance other than their utopian (distopian) dream world. whether you agree with every policy or not in a place (while not even being from a place, without their moral/ethical values, etc, context of a self-absorbed westerner). then they go and preach shit like communism. Absolute dinguses SorryI couldnt form full sentences I’m in the middle of somethin
>>180185 >so whats the analysis of someone advocating for a system, that every time tried, has failed with horrible results and even after 30+ years Yeah, that analysis is called an argument of weak induction. I could miss 30 free throw shots at a basketball court, but that doesn't mean i'll miss the 31st, 32nd, ..., shot. You'll need to use a stronger analysis.
>>180191 Actually, I admitted the first 10-15 years of the USSR was actual socialism. It just degenerated into Stalinism due to various political reasons. Wanna know the funny thing tho? It's capitalists that actually deny capitalism. People still say America isn't a capitalist country because "real capitalism has a free-market"
>>180458 It is actual insanity.
>>180458 Failing times 30 in a row thinking 31 will be perfect is actually the definition of insanity. And that you’re ass at basketball so leave it to the better players. Get off the court Never enter politics you imbecile
>>180460 Exactly what I was referencing. It's never the systems fault is it? It's the people. Does it ever enter your head that the system is there to service the people and not the other way round? And your critiques of the current system are meaningless to me regardless of what you call it. I prefer to live as is than gamble it all away on the 33rd hoop shoot.
>>180473 If we applied that form of weak induction to everything, we'd still be primitive humans with little to no science LOL. We'd have little to no technology because oh no -- many attempt fail, idea bad not execution! you're unbelievably retarded.
>>180488 >It's never the systems fault is it? It's the people. That is LITERALLY what you are doing. Socialism as a system is not flawed, because it is the only system that is representative of the interests of the common people since it is the common people in power -- and it is the only system in which its basis of production is need-oriented rather than profit-oriented. Capitalism does not care about the fact that resources are scarce -- it will continually squander our resources to its very end because capitalism requires continual growth. There is no slowing down capital, as the primary purpose of investment is personal profit. This is why tech batteries die prematurely, why razor blades dull faster, why companies burn their lumber during tariffs, why cars break down faster, etc.. Rather than creating long lasting products, Capitalists would rather increase our waste to get you to purchase things more. Rather than acknowledging that reality, you will say Capitalism as a system cannot be blamed because [insert some obscenely-exhausted argument about human nature here]. The reason socialism has failed before isn't because of anything intrinsic to socialism. It's literally because of either poor revolutionary work (for example, the Paris Commune failed because they didn't expropriate the banks funding the opposing government in Versailles) or because of counter-revolutionary efforts (such as the US' election interference, sactions, etc., Venezuela).
You fucking moron, we’re not talking about inventing something, we’re talking about the management of millions of humans who are all unique with their own ways of life. There are systems that uphold their values and keep things stable, and communism is not one of them. You are believably retarded, not even unbelievably, because you are a commie atheist faggot. Honestly, whats unbelievable is that you even like tits.
>>180579 and you value life so little that you are willing to gamble that 31st try on millions of innocent people. Fuck you, crawl back to your hole, you actual psychopath.
(105.92 KB 558x939 20221019_112057.jpg)
(197.98 KB 1280x1201 20221019_112148.jpg)
(136.34 KB 1280x1214 20221019_112117.jpg)
(157.15 KB 805x998 20221019_112005.jpg)
(77.12 KB 810x720 20221019_112039.jpg)
A Question ONLY for those few guys from Latin America. Why a lot of latina nsfw content creators whitewash themselves in their content? SERIOUSLY, Is there any specific reason why? Examples: these pics are from the same girl, a girl who has like 3 threads in this forum.
>>180583 >Does it ever enter your head that the system is there to service the people and not the other way round? You conveniently missed that bit out. You can dismiss human nature all you want but it undermines your well laid out plan. Always will. We're not beans to count.
>>180586 An there are no tits in a famine.
To answer your question about white washing European beauty standards are still what all non white women are held to and the closer to white you appear the more attractive you are in the eyes of people who hate their own skin color West Indian and Asian women are the number one buys of skin bleaching products because in their minds the closer to white you are the more attractive you are it’s programmed self hatred
>>180650 Difficult to say or get a good gauge on here. Women in the main control the beauty standards. They police it like their lives depended on it.
>>180807 Well, those situations are very lame to say the least
blah
why are so many new posts getting deleted recently? they have plenty of pictures to make them stay. and they dont have any spam, rants, or bad links either. but when i scroll down the next day the new post is gone.
>>182988 This thread holds a lot of the bull-shittery so the mods tolerance for things in other threads whether right or wrong, narrows. Probably
(146.00 KB 1520x1141 20221107_110007.jpg)
(233.71 KB 1187x1583 20221107_110759.jpg)
So how real is this
>>184266 0% not fake
>>184266 her old alias was k1tt13_1s_b4by (without the numbers obviously)
>>184266 50-50 I think it looks like she shops her waist at the least
>>184718 some of her stuff is on coomer and it looks shopped as bad as the cosplayer Queenie
>>185136 Sad people really pay to see that Queenie girl's photoshopped pictures. Does she even have a single video of her body? She doesn't seem worth it if it's just shopped pics to make her appear more thicc. Anyway uyuy2907 looks to be a legit and valid version of her anyway.
Hi guys, sorry for that, is there any forum or link about anastasia lux? I dont know how to search it in this website. Thanks
(1.26 MB 1080x1920 Unknown.mp4)
Any more ?
Discussion Point: You know what I would like to see. Every model thread is filtered every day and the comments without content deleted. That way each thread will be 100% content and no bitching.
>>187347 I want things too.
Dear Santa: This xmas I want more content on the threads, a bike, a monkey and a friend for the monkey.
Imagine going to union meetings and on your way in they wand you for weapons? Why because their own members want to fucking murder them for not giving them jobs like theyre supposed to.
>>188652 Fucking based tbh. The NLRB has been a pet project of the bourgeoisie and their accomplices for the better part of a century now. The passing of Taft-Hartley was the end, not the beginning. Any federally or legally recognized union is in at least some way an oxy-moron in its own right. Maybe once things get a little worse (and don't worry, they will) American workers will actually begin to want to count on each other in a real way. Probably not but I can dream I guess.
>>180588 Well thank god capitalism has never ever resulted in war or genocide killing millions by incentivizing weapons manufacturers and their parallel businesses to incite warmongering. Because that would be awful. It would also completely nullify your point and make you look like a completely brainlet. But it doesn't happen. Ever.
>>188674 What is it with retards and pushing socialism/communism. It must have to do with all the soy you faggots eat. It's a real simple equation, socialism/capitalism always leads to tyranny, famine and genocide. Capitalism has its faults but it's let's take a side by side of people who live in capitalism vs socialism/communism. Maybe there's a reason people flee communist countries. Jesus, there's no clearer indication of someone being an absolute fucking loser in life than trying to push communism. Why don't you just be honest and say "well, I have no motivation, I'm essentially just a fucking leech that will never put any effort into making my own way in life so I want someone to take care of me and my couch surfing, lonely, cuckold, narcissistic, parasite brethren because we don't have the capacity to make it ourselves". Fucking loser.
>>188674 By the way "bourgeoisie" means middle class you fucking sack of shit. It's not the mega wealthy, top earners and ceos of mega corporations. Its everyday people who take their ass to work, put effort in and make a life for themselves. Fucking garbage human being. Take your faggott ass to Venezuela or Russia if you wanna try out communism so bad. Of, that's right, they actually have to live under it and have already progressed to the point where they don't have shit. You wanna sponge off the people here who did something with their lives. You wanna be middle class, you just want someone to drag your socially and economically paraplegic ass up the mountai so you don't have to do anything yourself. Just eat a bullet already you fucking tick.
>>188691 At least he's not blaming shit on a fucking bean
>>188674 No one ever said it didn't and I'll take that over your failed ideology any day.
>>188690 >>188691 There are no Communist countries. The point of Communism is the dissolvement of the state, its boundaries, and the class structures which form the state and the boundaries. In order for Communism to even exist in the world, there can be no countries anywhere. And that's not happening any time soon, or ever. You're getting upset over a piece of fantasy someone told you was the truth. Meanwhile, our government is a varying mix of incompetent, old and decrepit, corrupt, or just bootlickers. Corporations have taken so much power for themselves that they create laws for themselves and get government kickbacks whenever they want. And the quality of life for most of the working class starts at poor and goes downwards from there. You don't need Communism or Socialism to fix things, but ranting at imaginary governments while shrugging at the problems at home does not help anyone. All you're doing is getting mad at invisible tigers for ruining your day, while the guy who told you they were there got you to sign away your life to him.
Fuck 197 and tom. Fuck u smiling so much rat mother fucker.
>>188748 That's why I fucking hate you retarded pieces of shit. " there are no communist countries" "oh it just wasn't done right". There's ebay of communist countries you fucking scumbag. They're the ones people flee in droves and have insane mass genocides. China. Russia. The USSR, Venezuela. Weak minded, no fucking initiative pussies like you cry about capitalism because you don't have the fucking wherewithal to make something of yourselves. The lower class here is better off than any people besides the elite in almost every country on the fucking globe that's anything but capitalist but because you shit stains don't have any back bone you want to leech off the work of other people to get you comfortable. You're a fucking plague and you fucking retards follow the teachings of some sniveling little piece of shit rich kid that just basked in the comfort of other people's work and thought how unfair everything was because he never managed to do anything on his own. If I had a good sturdy hatchet, plenty of redbulls and a free pass I'd personally purge the work of trash like you one split skull after the next. And I'd be doing the world a favor helping out over population, the environment and resource management all at once. The only thing you fucks are good for is fertilizer.
>>188831 I just pretend that he's just trolling and doing copypasta. That way, it's funnier and less sad that he's raging like this.
https://redgifs.com/watch/greedydarkredmink
(1.16 MB 169x246 morgpie.webp)
(1001.70 KB 500x279 SladkiSlivki.webp)
Just want to share with you one of my favorite porn: Throatpie https://www.sex.com/search/gifs?query=throatpie https://www.redgifs.com/browse?tags=ThroatPie&needSendGtm=on Models: Morgiepie SladkiSlivki ShantelDee Heather Deep Ana Lingus
Didn't you come here to steal porn from people trying to make a buck to live?
>>189041 Dude do you know how stupid your comment was. If someone leaks a vid and a model gets 200 extra subs from that leak then your not really hurting her situation or her wallet. Have some common sense. Alot of those leaks are from models that for.the most part.rip people off anyways
Back once again to remind you idiots that gravure is fucking stupid. Go watch actual porn. Also borderline cp since some girls start doing gravure before they're 16.
>>189382 By that logic all porn is borderline CP because CP exists. What a rocket scientist.
>>189500 Poor girl. Among the few pornstars that got better looking as she got older. I guess that's what happens when you love money, eventually uou will get a BBC in your mouth.
>>189515 Porn didn't make you obsessed with black cock, but it sure didn't help.
Vote them all out. Sick of the bullshit for last 20 years, now is your chance. People have the power not them. Time to take back the fight!
>>188830 >I have strong manly tough opinions about politics and I share them with uncompromising zeal on the forum where I go to jerk off over fat rolls lol stfu pencildick
>>189946 It's the run off thread created just for that.
The economy is in no shape or form doinng good. Amazon is dumping massive amount of share. Reccession only getting started for 2023 they lied to you all. All the billionaires are dumping shares.
Should I? How much is too much?
>>190410 Well that was erm, informative.
I wouldnt hire these cock suckers to run my baseball line up thats it.
Lucy Pinder for prosperity
>>190816 The photoshop - it burns!
I hate unions. Algorithmic Opression. Look at the age groups theyre oppressing right now. Only guys in their 50's getting most of the work to maximize thier pensions. And they dont like minorities. They hire a certain amount of blacks and spanish to keep the press quiet. Nobody is stupid. Lets expose union's corruption.
>>190816 This is bbw-chan, she's not fat enough. Besides, if you're gonna photoshop her then at least do it right. She looks like a $50 hooker
(69.08 KB 720x911 Union lmao.jpeg)
>>190923 Found the corporate shill. Go choke on your supervisor's massive schlong. Maybe if you please him enough your dick will one day be as big as his.
>>191094 I've sucked my own dick. I'm about 7.25 inches, and I did stretches for a while until I could get my mouth around the head. Always got a sore back, but worth it.
>>191097 Fancy getting a sore ass? Go fuck yourself.
>>191257 Ever heard of it?
>>191735 Ouch! Some dudes just love to hurt people and steal their shit. I guess? Angry nerd
why is there no trans/shemale board on bbwchan
>>191906 Cos we're bigots.
>>191906 that was.. refreshingly honest
onlyfans is going to ruin porn the way tiktok ruined online video. it's all trash, the lowest common denominator and least possible effort anyone can do. a few shitty jpegs or wiggle in front of the camera saying and doing nothing with a bored expression on their face. if they do make a video it's silent or playing dogshit music or a 'q&a' where she blathers for half an hour, as if i can jerk off to that. and of course all the simps still support this shit because they've deluded themselves into thinking theyre the boyfriends of these people. i dont want any video where you call me a 'fan'. i dont want any fucking video where the girl says 'hi guys' thus taking you out of it and reminding you theres another 100 men in the room jerking off. OF is quite possibly the worst thing to ever happen to porn. we've gone back to late 90s standards. poorly taken jpegs and silent videos. what in the absolute fuck?
>>191937 When are you going to get it through your head that everything is controlled by mega corporations and tech giants, and that it is all been planned this way? It wasn't ruined, it was deliberate. The models who saw the opportunity seized it. If you want to blame anyone then blame those handful of parent companies that seek to regulate in such a way as to make as much profit as possible. They don't care about you or the models. If you don't like it then the only thing that you can do is to make wise decisions as a consumer. Do not support companies that make inferior products. When you see someone doing the right thing make a purchase or donate. The models are contributing, regretably, but you can't blame them for trying to have fun while earning money because that is literally all these ladies know how to do.
>>191939 >trying to have fun they dont have fun and they hate their jobs. i used to work for one of these people and despite the fact she was well in the top 1% of earners she hated her job and every simp she had to deal with. its a lose lose situation for everyone but the higher ups at OF, which yes are a corporation, not that that was even my point my point was that it sucks ass and these 'stars' are lazy and talentless, dont even know the meaning of titillation and think that slightly rocking back and forth to nigger music constitutes being seductive
>>191942 Nothing you said contradicts my statement, but the tone of your response was as if you were meaning to correct me. You must mean that none of the models have fun or enjoy their job and do it because it is the easiest job to do? I thought the easiest job for an attractive model was getting married and staying home, but I can see what you wrote as a plausability, them staying aboard even when having other options. I doubt it's not at minimum slightly fun, and convinient way of life. I imagine them as party girls but even those that aren't have got to be social. Enjoying their independence while working for all those years as most of them do must be important to them then because other than the money and the lifestyle, if there aren't any other job benefits most workers would quit a job.
>>191943 no, they're just lazy whores and it shows in everything they do
>>191944 I agree, however that isn't the only reason, I'm sure, and probably a lack of developed skills, strong interest in the arts, and talent being more obvious explanations and that is a problem for every employer and actually it is why schooling came to being what it has become, but there sure are a lot of lazy young people these days. It's actually unsettling, honestly. Or strange. I don't mind lazy women though, not as much. I had many women in my family and although the older generation of women were titans, and I admire them to this day, most of the girls were shall we say more spoiled. I think they lack character due to a sheltered, protected life within a false reality that society provides. I think it's cute, although it's not something I would necessarily want for my own family, I do believe it is important to allow them to choose and to grow at their own desired pace while being able to give them support whenever it is needed. What do you do with the 32 year old kissless virgin who has never had a job and who's mind is filled with the most retarded shit you've ever heard? That is what I was wondering last night. He offered me a 20 min rant about pedos in Hollywood, and in my thoughts I held the desire to fist fight him.
lol why was the Lorraine thread deleted?
>>72915 >>72919 >>72923 I never understood how these pedo conversations became so viral all over the internet and social media, something I realized around the time of the elections that Trump won. The word pedo was on every site and anti-pedo propaganda was everywhere. I've never met a pedophile before, but in my country we don't have that word. We use other words like "child abduction", "child rapist", "child abuse", but when I hear the word pedophile to me it means someone who is attracted sexually to infants (newborns), so it confuses me sometimes. With that said, if the statistics were to show that most child abductors and rapists were part of the LGBTQ+ I would not find it hard to believe. At the same time I would not agree that it would be an excuse to go through with forming groups for violating people's rights, stalking and harrassing people, and actually in the states that is against the law. It's called Domestic Terrorism. But everybody knows right from wrong. Nobody has to tell you when you're doing something wrong. A lot of what is being done to those of alternative lifestyles' flat out fucked up. Some of us just don't care. I don't see what the big deal is. I've fucked lesbians before, and the dudes are way more "evil" than the lesbians and they are much more numerous. Still, it's not right. It's their bodies. As long as they don't get all fabulous and naked in public areas then it's not my business.
>>192122 It's the big push to normalise it. All barriers must be pulled down remember, now matter how taboo the subject. Bring it on I say. Public executions might shake things up a bit.
>>192139 Cool. Why do you sound like an idiot though? And why do you want to kill domestic terrorists? Or is it the child abductors you would like to see killed? If you were looking for trouble then you succeeded! I had trouble reading your post.
>>192140 You look like you have trouble with english if I'm honest. It'll become normal as the state refuse to punish the monsters and the public at large take matters into their own hands. Mark my words. People don't like their children being fucked in in the ass and they won't put up with it.
>>192141 lmfao. You'll be lucky if your hands don't get chopped off the way you're talking. Don't worry about my English though, it's my mouth and plus I already know you're not honest. You're not fooling anybody. I don't know who abducted and analized your child? But you are clearly out of your mind! and not sane enough to be passing judgement on anyone for their crimes. I wouldn't trust you as guardian of a child at your state anyways so.... But that's just me! Good luck with whatever demons you're carrying around, evidently. I'm sure... you're kids think you're a great father! LMFAOOO
>>192143 I have to worry about your ears when you put words in my mouth.
>>192145 Brooooooooo nobody wants to abduct your ugly ass kids! Dannn wtf is you thinking!? You are a crazy mf nut. Chill. Fucking ugly ass kids and shit..
>>192146 Oh. It's you.
>>191923 What sort of answer did you want? That board was closed with the last overhaul but there is /ee. If it was that popular it would still have it's own place but it can't be. Not here anyway.
>>192146 Are you saying you'd fuck a kid if it was attractive enough to you?
>>192151 Wtf are you talking about? I WAS an attractive boy at one point. Wtf is your problem? You must be that guy from the other thread I read. The dude that wish he got touched but didn't. Now you're lashing out and you're out to get every pedo because you were an ugly kid that nobody wanted to abduct! Fuck off. Pedos didn't ever want to abduct your ugly ass. Seethe.
>>192153 Tacit admission right there. lol
Stay out those cannabis disssscords they bunch of fucking liars! Go to reddit for help
What is it with these walls of text? It reminds me of John Does diaries.
Who is John Doe?
>>192693 Seven
>>192696 Maybe when I was 22
>>192697 The film, Seven
>>192699 Sorry. I don't get out much. I spent most of my life with wives/girlfriends and we didn't watch much tv together. We usually just hung out and fucked. I love pussy.
>>192700 A 27 year old film.... OK studly-good-fuck what you doing here then if that's the case? Not getting out much? Behave your fucking self.
>>192701 Wtf? I'll fuck you up pussy. I'll show you behave. Wait and see
>>192704 "fight me IRL". That how you charm the ladies? What a puckered fuck hole you are.
>>192705 Suck a big black dildo pussy
>>192707 Whats a dildo pussy? That like a flesh light or something?
>>192709 Yeah your face. Hungering for that big black dildo. That nasty shit
>>192711 You are entertaining.
>>192712 You're not a little white girl. You're ugly.
>>192714 You're genuinely making me lol.
I hate unions. Useless union delegates. They dont do shit but lie to their own members and give their cousins all the work. Sick of this shit. Im going to their office and make them all resign indefinitely. You can show up to contractors offices or go to your union office. And still get nothing because the unions and contractors all sleep in bed together. Me and a team of lawyers are building the biggest lawsuit against corrupt unions in north america. We are recording what they say and what they do as delegates. The downfall is almost here for them. No more corruption
>>192715 Seethe.
>>192716 They wont care once they retire dude. Them and their buddys. Thats the whole point be dirty as fuck then pull out its fuck everyone to them thats how they think then when u to to meetings they smile in your face asking if youre working and all kinds of bullshit just to " keep up with the image" theyre all fraud and corrupt
>>192717 Giggle
>>66604 Btw your accusations are incorrect. I haven't ever payed anybody for sex in my life for many reasons, and I view it as beneath me. I am above it. I love making love way too much, and I love women way too much to pay for sex. I have had opportunities to pay the $25 or the $30, but I gave the girl the money she needed and left. Prostitutes don't look like in the movies all hagged up. They look fucking SEXY. You would never know. Gorgeous, tall, thick, blonde hoes that look better than most pornstars. So you shouldn't wait for the temptation to arrive and then beg for forgiveness after. Instead you pray before the temptation. You ask God for mercy so the temptation doesn't catch you in a moment of particular weakness or vulnerability. I've fucked prostitutes before but we were hanging out and I didn't pay them. They were either friends of friends or I met them at a club. If we click then I will pay for a room. I may decide to pay a prostitute in the future and make a mistake, but I hope not. Sin is something we do against our own bodies. The price of sin is death. Sex is awesome and girls are literally the only thing good about this fucked up Earth. Why would I ever pay for a prostitute?
>>192760 John Doe
Tell your lawyer theyre trying to threshold how much your household makes theyre working together. Make sure you note every corrupt behavior.
I cant stop thinking about fucking my gym trainer
>>192852 Never tell him.
>>192760 I mean theirs many good qualities and aspects about life. I mean sex is great but it's not what forms us into the kind of people we want to be. I got married but that was my choice and you choose to fuck chicks that are easy and that's yours. Sex is nowhere near the only thing g that matters and it never should be
>>192920 I know you're Here you said "accusations" now I want top dollar for figuring out all you assholes on here.
>>193005 You know nothing like the rest of us you fucking loser. Just get back to jacking off like the rest of us and spare us your verbal diarrhea.
>>193009 Like a genie in the bottle rub me the right way. Chuckle in the butt.
>>193009 They know plenty. They have addresses from several official sources (some say illegally purchased without consent), they also have payed for hackers/activists, and also have on-foot payed-for and volunteering "informants" (at least here in the US). It is said that some utilize services such as Air bnb while others "purchase homes" from one another for strategic locations near certain places of interest. It isn't a stretch of the imagination to assume that some of these individuals apply for specific jobs such as Fed Ex, and local post offices just the same as they purchase data from online websites. It is not yet known how far the reaches of the corruption because even phones that are "secured" have been reported to be hacked which would mean either at a phone company level hack or through some corruption in the NSA. It is obviously difficult to pin point however it is common knowledge that these things are going on abd it isn't a hoax to incite paranoia. Be careful who you trust. New neighbors I am especially cautious of. You know the saying never relax, but even in latino communities there have been reports. Obviously if you have an "ex-sargeant" cop from NY living next door to you then it shouldn't make you feel any safer, dummy. But you never really can tell who it is. They are a minority. Be careful who you trust. I would trust a slut over a prostitute, but even then you have to be careful. If you don't know them from childhood and you don't know their family from generations back I wouldn't hang around those nuts if I were you. Their work is fueled by money and other incentives but there are also activists/volunteers, so the for sure thing is that once the money eventually dries up their whole organization will fall. How are they funded? Is it coke, weed, and that other powder that you mix with water? Or are they funded by rich elites? When they target you it can be for any number of reasons. Usually from what I can tell they want you to go away, but their end-goal remains a mystery and probably has something to do with recent political affairs and manipulation of our laws through an agenda of controlled precision attacks. Like I said, they are insignificant, their main weapon is lies. When you fuck a slut, make sure that you know she's not a whore! and make sure that you fuck her right! LMFAOOO for real. you better give her the dick every time she calls you! you better go running! lmaooo Or just don't fuck and don't start a family I guess. If you love pussy... be careful with these snakes with a capital s that pretend to care about everyone. They're g. We have to protect our hoes because without these little tiny pussy hoes we won't have no country left. Spread the word, and fuck your hoes right and frequently!
Retired from my union no more toxic lifestyle I feel so free to be happy and make my own business.
>>193200 why would anyone ever join a union? It's just another group of people exploiting you?
>>193202 They're whores. They don't care about what is right or wrong. They're looking out for their best interests. Thankfully, most of us from here don't put money above everything!
>>193202 Because unions are one of the few shields that employees have to stop employers from firing them for any reason. And one of the few things that allow for employees to get higher wages over time instead of hoping that their bosses do it out of the "kindness of their hearts." And considering that most people don't have the time, money, networking skills, or luck to just open their own business, getting as many points of leverage in their favor as possible is far better than relying on the "kindness" of the bosses' heart.
>>193247 Unions can't save you. If the employer wants the employee gone they're toast. It's a scam. Save your cash.
>>193248 Not if the union is worth a damn. Even if it isn't, at least being in one slows up the process of getting fired and gives you at least a month's worth of wages that you wouldn't have had if it's just you. We don't live in some fantasy world where companies are small, everyone knows everyone, and the bosses pay attention and are willing to give raises because you work hard. As more and more corporations consolidate and decent jobs become scarcer and harder to hold onto, and people are being forced to work more for less, having unions is one of the few leverages we have left. They're shitty, but it's better than relying on luck and prayer.
>>193250 Pay into the corruption if you must but I'll take my chances on my own.
>>193256 For every person that went "on their own" and succeeded, there are hundreds of thousands more that failed and ate shit for it. This isn't some movie, none of us are the hero of the story, and the odds of you eating shit for going "on your own" are bigger than the odds of you succeeding. And it's getting worse. But sure, focus on a generalized idea of "corruption" when the barriers between you and starvation are getting weaker and weaker and corporate power to fuck you over is almost absolute.
>>193270 You're correct it is not movie but don't let that stop you getting all high and mighty. My attitude works for me and has done for most my working life which is not a small stretch of time I assure you. Out of all companies I have worked for not one employee was saved by a union once the knives were out. I don't expect you to believe me but that's how it's been.
>>193277 My "high and mighty" attitude is me realizing that I don't have shit and probably won't have shit for the rest of my life. That I don't have the luxury to lie to myself and think that doing things "my way" and "going on my own" is going to get me anywhere or do anything but make me even poorer and more on the fringes than I already am. But I'm not alone, and I'd rather be in the same boat with and teaming up with those guys for something real than pretend that I'm some character in a movie where I can just "work for myself" and the happy music plays when I finally triumph over the evil union bad guy in the film. So fuck you, you goofy bastard. Go peddle your main character fantasies somewhere else.
>>193280 Get off your ass. You're not a victim, you're a leach.
>>193286 Because working and making sure you don't get fucked by teaming up with others in the same position is leeching? Wow, the "leech on society" meme has finally lost all value. Good. Hopefully the "self-made" meme can join it in the grave.
>>193290 >I don't have shit and probably won't have shit for the rest of my life. Sounds like you want something for nothing to me but at least you recognise you have nothing. Now you can either waste time trying to reform unions as countless others have failed to do or you can address your problem.
>>193292 So doing the job I was hired to do, getting paid for the hours I put in for that job, and making sure I don't get fired for some bullshit reason is "wanting something for nothing?" Well, at least that's another meme that is now meaningless. But yes, tell me more about the benefits of giving away what little power I have to take on huge amounts of risk with little to no chance of reward. Or how entering into business markets that are consolidating and either destroying small business in their wake or making it impossible to even get started is a good idea. If I am stuck choosing between your fantasies and putting food on the table, then I choose putting food on the table. At least the food is real.
>>193304 Odd fantasy. I'm no millionaire but it's a reality. Continue to remain bitter an expect to become more so. A fantasy is believing a union cares more about you beyond your dues and an X in their predetermined box.
>>193308 You're not even a millionaire and you're spouting off that bullshit? And you expect people to believe you know what you're talking about? Way to overstate your importance, anon. I don't expect the union to care. I expect them to do their job so I can keep mine and get paid enough to keep on living. And if that means paying dues and checking off a box when it's time, then so be it. Your fantasies and memes sure aren't going to help me.
>>193312 Do I need to be a millionaire to put my real food on a table? Status is very important to you isn't it? If it pleases you, rest assured I live a very modest existence. Your union sells you a false hope, a security blanket. You strike me as a very unhappy person with a persecution complex. The perfect union recruit.
>>193313 You don't have to be a millionaire to put food on the table, but you do have to be one to back up the talk you're making about throwing away unions and "just going into business for yourself." Because talk is only as good as the actions taken to make that talk happen. And only if you can make it clear what actions you took to get you where you are. If you can't do that or obscure that, then either there's something wrong or you're leaving a lot out of the conversation. All you've done is meme, shit on unions, and reveal that your situation is similar to mine despite all of your talk. Probably even worse because it's a lot easier for you to fail and completely fall through the cracks than it is for me. All you've got is memes. Good luck with that.
>>193317 Obsessed with memes. All I've done is worked and had noting to do with unions because all they ever did for my more unfortunate colleagues was take their money and loyalty. That's my secret if it ever was one. Maybe I wasn't clear.
>>193320 But its perfectly clear. You have no idea on how unions work, you've never been in one, but you think you're superior to the people who are. You also assume you're paid the same when the people in unions are probably paid much more than you and have better job security. All you see are dues and voting and that's all you want to see because you want to pretend that you have "the answers" and that you're better than them.
>>193325 Union job security is a myth. I know so. I negotiate my own terms, keep appraised of the rate for the job and prove my worth. As anyone with half a mind should. And I have MY answer. Don't get exploited. But don't let me stop you paying idiot tax.
>>193328 You do freelance work. By definition, you don't know shit. Because if you did know something, you'd actually run a business with a stable source of income and not run from job to job sucking off the guys hiring you so you can pay rent. You're probably an Uber driver or a Doordash driver too.
>>193333 Keep paying for people to think for you. I'm sure it's of comfort but don't fool yourself.
>>193334 Freelancing, particularly at the beginning of one's venture into that space, is incredibly unstable and not something I would flippantly recommend anyone do. Especially those who don't have the resources to do it or lack help to get things started or get through the first few years. You don't know where your next job or paycheck is, you have incredibly limited resources, you are forced to work longer hours and do multiple jobs to maintain your status, you don't know if the market you're getting into will disappear in 5 months and you'll be shit out of luck. And speaking of luck, doing freelance work is far more reliant on being lucky than just applying for a regular 9-5. The most disturbing part is that you treat this like it's a personality trait or proof of your "specialness" or "freedom of thought" rather than a choice with it's own pros and cons. All the while using lies about union jobs to make yourself feel good. Then again, it's probably more likely that you have a lot of help between your "jobs" and you're making this more than what it is so that you feel good about yourself. You want to feel like you're doing something right and not feel like a fuckup holding on for dear life and praying that the next bit of work will get you through. Which is the risk of doing freelance work. Something that everyone should know before deciding to do it. Which they won't if they believed a word you wrote.
>>193360 Keep guessing. I'm not freelance and I've had the same employer for over a decade holding multiple positions. None management. I do not aim to deceive and I'm unconcerned with your faith in my information.
>>193333 Court systems in 2023 will take care of guys like you dont worry. You talk like the guy behind all the hot mess. Don't worry when you get a law suit notice on your desk you will no no one is fucking around with you low life losers.
>>193333 the fact you responded so fast and aggressively to this statement tells us all. We pulled the rabbit out of the fucking hat. Lawsuit lawsuit lawsuit 2023 lawsuits bring corruption to a halt.
>>193434 Freelance undermines his system and it must be demonized.
So is it just against the rules to write anything longer than a line in any of these threads? I've noticed any kind of longer post gets deleted, even if it's entirely on-topic
>>193497 I think it's fine in here. It's just reams of text in the model threads that are frowned upon.
>>193434 Did you just respond from two different windows or something? Are you that desperate in your life? That's just sad.
Everybody here gay or sumn? Post fat tittys
There's only one way to bring corruption to a halt and that's heads have got to roll, plus it is only a temporary solution.
>>193748 Yeah..... You know beauty! Fucking Americans. Tell me the story about your grandpa and his nuts, or the one about how you guys ran a whole country.... into the ground, or what about the one where the little white girls are the devil? You don't need to be told what beauty is though. You're not a complete fucking idiot borderline retard. You've done a fine job! Americans are the most intelligent! We are the chosen ones by God! We have the best saints. This is the best country in Earth to live. Make sure you carry protection because the mob wants to catch you by when you least expect it and you're by yourself.
>>299861 Yeah because BBC are so rare! And they must be preserved! Do you have any clue how abundant and plentiful BBC are? If you want to talk about the r word as in humans species or more accurately of human features? You're a fucking idiot.
>>193769 Why are you posting your replies to other threads in here? Half the links don't work and it's impossible to know what you mean.
>>193769 He's jacking off to BBC now. That's all he means. The tits here are just an excuse for cock-watchers.
>>193834 Obsessed with it maybe. But they hate the idea of the Black men those cocks are attached to. I say the idea because none of them have ever met a Black guy beyond porn and 4chan memes and what their racist family members tell them about the Black people they've never met as well.
>>193842 Yes, I am entitled to my own opinion because it's my opinion. That's how it works. But the objectification of Black men into sexual fetishes has been going on in America since Antebellum Slavery. Hell, probably since the beginning of the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade. The idea of hypersexualized Black bodies was used to justify keeping White women away from Black men, used to justify whatever violence White people wanted to inflict on Black men, and used for entertainment purposes. There may be some Black men that are so self-hating that they participate in this, but it's been White people that have pushed for the creation of this shit, obsess over it, and consume it the most.
About time. Sick of seeing executive boards full of white faces. Get black people get spanish people. Get indian people up there. All these fucking white faces gots to go!
Its 2023 why is there so many white faces sitting at the table?
>>193851 LMAO, no. They were viewed as violent, degenerate savages beholden to their vices. You're projecting whatever fetishes or ethno-narcissism you have onto people of the past. Stop it, get some help.
>>194071 Because hypersexuality wasn't a vice? https://www.ferris.edu/HTMLS/news/jimcrow/jezebel/index.htm Yes, the hypersexualization of Black people, Black men and women, was used as a excuse for the benefit of White people. Whether for sex, violence, or entertainment. This was not pick and choose and this has been going on for centuries. Whether it was used to justify Chattel Slavery, used to justify Segregation, or used in the "Southern Strategy" to keep up the informal segregation and over-policing/harsh imprisonment and just overall underserving of Black communities and Black people.
>>194081 The fetishization of race isn't unique. Fetishes come in all shapes and sizes and only race grifters or people that are actually into that focus on this one rather than say, feet or pants shitting. Who the fuck cares where it's rooted?
Yeah get rid of these bullshitting people. And I like to golf & big tits
>>194197 There is a huge difference between an individual fetishizing others and a group using fetishizing to justify exerting power over others for the benefit of the group. This wasn't the actions of a few "bad apples" that where cloistered from the whole group. It took the group to make it happen. It took the majority, whether it was people who supported the act or turned a blind eye to it, to ingrain it into the culture and normalize it.
>>194264 Sometimes it's not about power and oppression. It's probably 99.9% of the time. It's even possible for a member of a group not to be representative of that group. If you feel that way then I condemn you for having an interest in big tits because some rapists like big tits.
You want to make alot of money? Not worry about your boss getting upset because your life style is better? You want to fuck more big tit women and golf?
Bycott disney plus kamar
>>194298 You need 4chan my friend.
>>194267 But most of the time, it is about uniting a group of people under a common cause and share perceptions concerning that cause. And the best way to get them to come together is through power and an enemy to fight. And the more wild and fictious that enemy is, the longer you can get that group to fight. No, White people aren't a monolith. But White people aren't individualistic/hyper-individualistic to the extent you wish they were. And White people, since the concept was created, moved as a united group for the majority of this country existence, when overt White Supremacy was the law of the land. One person does not represent the whole. But if enough people move in the same direction for the sake of a common cause, it would be stupid to ignore it for the sake of point out an empty and detached notion of "individualism."
>>194348 That's maybe the dumbest shit I've seen someone write on here. White people were not unified for most of this country's existence, they were still largely separated all the way up into the early 1900s. Every single group that came over after the Brits was treated like garbage. The Italians, Pols, Irish, etc. They all had periods where they couldn't even get hired for the most part in average society. Tap dancing has its roots in traditional Irish dance because Irish and blacks often comingled because the Irish were looked at as essentially the same thing to the British and early Americans when they had their turn immigrating here. People always say some stupid shit trying to sound intelligent.
>>194348 Who is ignoring it? I merely said that 99.9% people aren't considering their fetish as a tool of oppression. All wasn't uttered. There's that pesksy supply/demand ratio again. I do have to admit this is a new one to me - Uniting under the banner of BBC for the glorious revolution. It's made my Friday! >>194398 Is correct too. You've heard of No Blacks, No Irish, No Dogs right?
>>194398 And the Italians and Irish were eventually folded into Whiteness once they could prove that they were unified under upholding White Supremacy and chose to oppress non-white groups, Black people in specific but anyone brown enough to exclude from Whiteness. Except for Jewish people, every group with white enough skin and willing to uphold White Supremacy were eventually brought into the fold. Even White Latinos are slowing being brought into the fold now. The real division within White people and identified White groups is over who is in power and whether the interests and comforts of White people is central to the actions taken. But the driving force has always been Whiteness and whatever moral or cultural ideas that would maintain Whiteness at the forefront of society. Ask anyone who isn't terminally online or in /pol/ about whether the Irish or Italians or Polish are White, and you'll get a clear "yes" to that. Their past of non-whiteness is one that is either ignored or forgotten or downplayed, save for /pol/tards who play keyboard White Supremacists. >>194405 Being ignorant of history, influences, and the structures which built your surroundings does not exclude you or absolve you from repeating ahistorical information, perpetuating those influences and maintaining those surroundings If anything, it's better that White people as a group are ignorant of what's going on. It makes holding onto or reworking the status quo much easier than figuring out a new way to run things. Especially a new way that does not center White people. White men are the biggest consumers of porn in the country, and the United States is the biggest consumer of porn in the world. Whether they sincerely believe that its about "color contrasts" or they tell you its about degrading White women with black cocks, the "BBC genre" is a form of Black degradation for White men to keep the system going and the structures of said system in place. Joking or not, there is no uniting under the "BBC" banner. It's just another stereotype to reinforce and perpetuate the idea of Black male hypersexuality for White consumption. The both of you grossly overestimate your "individuality."
>>194409 >The both of you grossly overestimate your "individuality." Likewise with your collectivism. Who the is thinking like this when jacking it? Even if it's why BBC porn is produced the consumer has to buy in to your group mentality. Horny just isn't that deep. I know you're the "smart guy" so just bear that out. Not everyone, almost no one is thinking like you. They're fulfilling a need.
>>194412 And just like I wrote before, being ignorant of something does not exclude you or exempt you from perpetuating it or reinforcing it or participating in it. And being horny doesn't give you a pass. It's not a matter of thinking like me, it's a matter of being aware of your surroundings and how they work. It should be the bare minimum. But somehow it isn't.
>>194415 I don't seek your pass. You see another system of oppression that must be bulldozed when no one else does. This is kink shaming to serve your politics.......... again. Do you have these thoughts when making a coffee? What the underlying politics are.
>>194409 The biggest wars and most destructive conflicts have been between "white people", hardly points to some overarching "white agenda". A lot of "whites" used their "whiteness" and gave their lives to end slavery, the same sort of "white" people who get either lauded/scorned today for campaigning against racial injustice
>>194417 You don't have a point, do you? Just buzzwords that add up to "I wanna fap to what I want and not think about it." And it's "eh." Not like I can stop you from being stupid, and if I'm honest, it's not like you're going to do more or think more beyond buzzwords. At least the others tried to present something. You...just need to go back to fapping. >>194426 Those same whites also used their whiteness to justify Chattel Slavery and create colonies that oppressed and destroyed different ethnic groups. They also used their Whiteness to create the system of White Supremacy we see in the modern day. So what's your point? If you want me to say "not all White people" then fine. Not all White people participated in fucked up things. And some White people are trying to do right by minorities and other White people. But enough White people either participated in doing fucked up things or were willing to turn a blind eye to fucked up things to make those fucked up things happen and happen on a large scale. Fucked up things who's repercussions are still being seen and felt in the present day.
>>194428 I'm stupid because I'm not obsessed with race? That is my point. Your analysis is just identity politics or any other form of class dynamics. You try to validate your preoccupation by pitting groups against one another and I'm not interested in your approval. Deconstruct your onanism if you must but you're pretty much on your own. Haha, pun.
Any man who steps to your face during a normal conversation is a woman beater telling you right now
>>194428 Wealthy ethnics sold their own people into slavery, ethnics are quick to blame the white man for all the world's evils, ignoring all the savagery and butchery they perpetrated amongst themselves and continue to do so today
>>194431 No. You're stupid because you're using buzzwords that lost their meaning towards concepts you don't understand to explain group dynamics you either don't give a shit about or actively seek to avoid because it makes you think. This isn't about identity politics, this is about history. Class analysis only work in a limited, materialist framework and tend to fall short when it comes to race and group dynamics and the irrationality of humanity. And I don't have to pit groups against each other, it's been going on for centuries and the only people who consistently come out on top are the same people who built the fucked up structures in the first place. Go back to fapping. Nobody's stopping you. >>194442 And the newly created White race made a system to profit from said slavery and created a social structure where White Supremacy was the primary goal. Was it wrong for the various African countries to sell their enemies, their countripeople, and random innocent people into slavery? Yes. Does it excuse or lessen what White people did during the Tran-Atlantic Slave Trade and the structures they built as a result? No. One does not erase or lessen the other.
>>194490 Does your significant other cum to you reading the communist manifesto? I mean I'm positive that you can.
Every American rapper has been caught on film beating women, and not all of them were wrong for doing it either, unless you mean in the sense that violence is never the answer. When you are violent you open yourself up for liability because the other person can claim self defense. So, think before you harass people on the street because you might be asking for trouble. Harassment is against the law. If you follow people and they pull a gun on you, don't cry.
>>194490 This slimy prick denies identity politics and in the same post to another anon decries white supremacy. How can anyone take such a person seriously?
>>194494 I'm not a Communist or a Socialist. >>194508 White Supremacy isn't about identity, it's about power for White people. Any sense of "identity" is nebulous at best and the people who sincerely think that White Supremacy is an identity are the same people stupid enough to buy a product in the hopes of someone saying something that "offends" them so they can post on social media. Unless that's what White culture and White identity truly is. Incredibly sheltered, thin skinned men and women looking for an excuse to feel victimized, even if it means paying to put themselves in the position to be victimized. Because if that's the case, then welcome White people to actually being a race of people and not some nebulous idea used to justify getting power. I hope you enjoy the ride.
>>194515 You talk about people not understanding concepts and you claim white is not an identity? Double speak. No one buys it even if you do.
>>194519 Britain has a culture and identity with a long, complex history with good and bad parts. Scotland has a culture and identity with a long, complex history with good and bad parts. Ireland has a a culture and identity with a long, complex history with good and bad parts. Italy has a culture and identity with a long, complex history with good and bad parts. But Whiteness has none of that history or complex identities and perspectives that those cultures had. In order to create and enter into Whiteness, it's participants deliberately erased any and near all meaningful ties to the history and the culture and complexities of their ancestry for the sake of getting power and money under the banner of Whiteness. And the only things that are left are only there to be used as props to keep power within Whiteness and keep anyone deemed "white" as a participant in that system of Whiteness. There is no double speak. Whiteness has no culture it respects, no history it adheres to, no traditions or identity it believes in other than what gives it power. You want identity? The go and find it outside of Whiteness, because there is nothing in Whiteness than power.
>>194529 The term white supremacy is not fit for purpose then. Don't use it.
>>194529 It is defined by a term of identity as does white power. "we're going to attach all potentially negative aspects to white. But it's not an identity. You don't get that dignity, just the shit."
>>194529 >Incredibly sheltered, thin skinned men and women looking for an excuse to feel victimized, even if it means paying to put themselves in the position to be victimized. Kinda sounds familiar too. It's the sort of thing that's said about a people of a different hue by racists.
You know who I dislike these days? Pretenders. They are actors who learn to copy humans in their natural habitat with the purpose and intent of disguising themselves, similar to what sociopaths learn to do. It is a way they, like the chamilleon, absorb from others and portray a fictitious personality. These types are everywhere. Some of them just want to fit in and be part of the herd. I have seen it in my life how these types go out of their way to act, look, and sound in a particular style for the purposes of being mistook for a different nationality or ethnicity. When he takes off the mask and the hoodie then you realize that he's chinese and fluent in mandarin. These fakers exist and they are all around us. Stay armed and use deadly force when necessary. Do not let them bully you. They use fear as a weapon.
>>194530 There's no other term that fits other than neo-feudalism. Unless you want to argue that the goal of Whiteness is not upholding White Supremacy but installing a new kind of feudalism, then that's a conversation to be had. >>194532 I don't have to attach potentially negative aspects to Whiteness. It did it itself to uphold White Supremacy and maintain power for itself. But defining yourself by the power you have over others is not an identity. Nor is it an identity to define yourself by the negative aspects you assign to other groups to keep people in the White group together. And if you can't deal with the whole of what your group has done, both good and bad, then what good is an "identity?" All you'll be looking for is history to cherry pick to make yourself feel good. >>194533 That's how racism has worked in America since Chattel Slavery. Create an "other" that you can assign traits to that dehumanize that "other" group while slotting yourself into a position of power to control that group for your benefit. Assuming you have the power to do so, of course. Some people have no real power to do anything and never get the power to do anything, but still try to participate in the system of Racism whether as a means of survival or pyrrhically looking for power.
>>194542 I don't think it's used in non white countries where the same methods were used to retain and distribute power. That would be silly wouldn't it and it would in fact destroy your definition. It's almost like this is some sort of demoralization tactic only used in white majority white countries. You do get why people might get antagonized by your definition and why they may consider it unfair? How could you make them accept your framing when it comes across very much as a personal attack? Here's another one. Do you recognize black culture?
>>194548 Those countries also were made up of a homogenous group and their power structures are usually focused on familial ties or interpersonal ties, whereas White Supremacy and Whiteness rely on having a significant minority population to which to define by traits to separate them from Whiteness and ultimately enrich the White Supremacist power structure. You can't gain power and wield power in a homogeneous group in the same way you can with a diverse group. Especially if you want to make sure that other groups have little to no power in the structures you wish to build. So I don't get your point other than to do a whataboutism. And what is unfair about it? This is about history, not personal feelings. White people came into power through violence and oppression and have been the primary beneficiaries of that violence and oppression for centuries. The only real difference is that the people in power used skin color to justify the violence and oppression for their benefit instead of using God or just saying "I have more weapons than you." I mean, what do you want me to say? That it was a necessary evil or ultimately benevolent? Because it wasn't necessary or benevolent, and any good that came from it was mostly for the benefit of Whiteness and White Supremacy. So do you want to be patted on the head for it? And do I recognize Black culture? Yes and no. Yes in the terms of Black people or people of the African Diaspora seeking an identity and culture separate from Whiteness, White Supremacy, and Colonialism. No in the sense of those within the African Diaspora, Black Americans especially, being directly and indirectly influenced by White Supremacy and oppression and creating ideas and cultures based on that influence. But in terms of Black culture and Africa, then that gets muddled because now you have centuries of intertribal and intratribal dynamics along with individual cultures and histories that were not defined by skin color or a unified agenda. Even though White Supremacy and Colonialism has a role in shaping certain countries within the continent, Whiteness has never had that prominent of a hold due to White Supremacist countries never taking over the whole continent. And even though more and more countries in Africa are starting to wake up to the concept of Blackness and are doing more to separate themselves from White Supremacy, it's still not going to be the same and it's still going to be complex.
>>194554 There are plenty of countries both contemporary and historically that include many races that parallel the advancement of the west, They weren't all ethnostates and you know that. If you don't treat blackness the same way you do whiteness then you're either a hypocrite or a racist. It could be argued that there are a greater number of black cultures than there are white. Without looking I would out money on it. Sorry about the question about antagonism. I forgot you don't consider white an identity so it would be a blind spot.
>>194556 Except I'm talking about how power is gained and maintained through homogenous groups and diverse groups, with a focus on White Supremacy and Whiteness and the power it gained. You're bringing up something that has nothing to do with the topic at hand. And why should I treat Blackness the same as Whiteness when the goals and outcomes are not the same? The goal of Blackness is to seek and create an identity and culture outside of Whiteness. The goal of Whiteness is to uphold White Supremacy. Even if that wasn't a part of the conversation, Black people have no power within White Supremacist countries that isn't given to them by Whiteness in the service of Whiteness and White Supremacy. The idea that a oppressed group holds equal power to the oppressor You're basically saying that by virtue of using the same classification system, and only by that virtue, that all things are equal. And they clearly are not equal.
>>194563 You are focusing on white and I am focusing on power. OK say the "yellow" people become majority power brokers in a "yellow/brown" populated country. You, using your logic would have to use yellow supremacy and build your argument round that. The concept of color based power kind of falls over because it just might be about power and not color. The color is actually incidental. You say white because it's what you associate the injustice with. They have many cultures to choose from or in fact build their own around their color. Even if that sounds kind of shallow. I think afro american might be the go to and that is indeed outside whiteness. But you must agree with me that whiteness is a culture if they are are chasing a culture outside of it. Things are not and never will be equal or fair ever. Get used to it. You can either treat people individualy or descend into hell. Carving out a life for yourself doesn't imply you agree with a stacked deck.
>>194569 Except, in order for it to be "Yellow Supremacy" the Yellows would have to gather together as a group for the sake of gaining power over the Browns by forcing the Browns to be the other that defines the "Yellowness" of the Yellows. If it's a dictatorship or an autocracy or a plutocracy, then it would have to be defined by whether or not it fits those terms. But that's the point; to examine the structures within the group that's in power to determine what it is and what it isn't. Saying "maybe" doesn't mean anything, especially if you can't back it up with anything concrete. Just because there's an option for something else does not mean it's something else. And if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck and swims like a duck, it's probably a duck. Things will never be equal. But countries can be equitable and create systems that aren't completely based off of exploitation and oppression and the creation of the "other" to justify that oppression and exploitation. But it's going to take more than just "maybe it wasn't like that" or some blind faith in individuality being the cure to group dynamics and governance of whole societies. A part of it is going to take having a hard look at an honest of a history as we can get to figure out where to go.
>>194563 I just had a thought concerning my color/power comment. Am I speaking to a race realist?
>>194575 "Race Realists" are no different from phrenologists. It's all just pseudo-scientific nonsense used to justify the hierarchies where Whiteness and White Supremacy maintain power. There's no inherent aspects to different groups of people that plots to anything resembling a hierarchy or a superior/inferior dichotomy. It's all guesswork and people struggling to survive in an uncertain world where you never really know when you can die and how. And the only way we're going to survive in the future is as a united people with a common interest in our survival, even if we don't look alike or have the same cultures and traditions. And that requires everyone having cultures and traditions to use as a basis for communication and forming like-interests.
>>194574 >>194578 Who says the yellows didn't do that? You can't prove either way. The constant is power. But to escape a thing to seek another does imply that it is another thing you are seeking. Thing in this case is culture so there is a white culture. I didn't say this, you did. I don't have a lot of time for faith. Relying on things outside of my control doesn't inspire me or guarantee any sort of reward no mater how small. Good luck in advancing anything to do with how we operate. If the last few years taught me anything its that we resort to type in a heart beat. Whether it be vaccine take up or ukraine, us and them is biological. Have fun fighting it. The only answer is maybe breed out but you're up against the bastards and the retarded. I did just say luck but you need a miracle.
>>194581 First, either they did or they didn't. If they didn't do it, then history will prove they didn't do it. But saying "maybe" means nothing. It just muddies the waters so you don't actually have to do anything but still feel like you said something. Second, saying "the constant is power" means nothing without something to qualify the statement. And all you've done is say "maybe." So that idea is useless. Third, you said nothing about escaping a thing to get to another thing. Nor does it prove the existence of a culture or that Whiteness is a culture that isn't dependent on White Supremacy. You don't have a point or much of a thought that went beyond whatever makes you feel good. So I hope you got what you're looking for.
>>194586 Are you really saying that at no time ever did any non white race hold majority power over other races? "I am escaping a culture to establish my culture. The culture I am escaping is white." Maybe I paraphrase. It's not about making myself feel good, although that is a pleasant diversion. It's about survival and making the most out what little the universe gifted me. Changing the world in not realistic in my three score years and ten. Did you get bored? lol
>>194587 This is what I wrote >Those countries also were made up of a homogenous group and their power structures are usually focused on familial ties or interpersonal ties, whereas White Supremacy and Whiteness rely on having a significant minority population to which to define by traits to separate them from Whiteness and ultimately enrich the White Supremacist power structure. There's your answer. Second, to "escape" a culture implies that one is being held hostage by that culture. A White person cannot escape Whiteness because they are not being held captive by it. They can choose to leave it and build a new culture that isn't dependent on White Supremacy and the concepts of Whiteness that exist to bolster White Supremacy, or reclaim their ancestral histories and the cultures and ideas contained within them, but they are not prisoners of their Whiteness. Three score years = 20x3. Add on 10 and you're claiming to be 70. And I refuse to believe you're 70 years old on a goddamn BBW imageboard. So you either do not know what a score is or you fucked up your math.
>>194597 Got it. All states an their power structures outside the west are ethnostates therefore whiteness cannot exist there (sarc). You even said "usually" and you think this is a win? You said - >The goal of Blackness is to seek and create an identity and culture outside of Whiteness. If it's not a culture of whiteness that is smothering or displacing their ability to create their own then what is it? That would mean whiteness is a culture then? You tied culture to identity a while back there. So surely the culture of whiteness is a large part of identity so there must a white identity after all given your definition? Three score years and ten is a dated term for average lifespan. I didn't claim I was threes score years and ten. Additionally how do you not understand why whiteness or white blah blah blah might be offensive? Jewness isn't tolerated to describe behaviors and neither should it. You need better words if you want to change the world for the better.
>>194597 Minority rule is just not the same as whiteness. Races that hold it are not souly white even if they employ similar tactics and those tactics that are demonstrably universal. Whites are not uniquely shit in this regard unless you are in fact a phrenologist. The word is meaningless in connection to what you describe and can only be a political one coined by racebaiters.
>>194606 The creation of an ethnostate requires a outside race or races to which the group in power can banish from it's claimed territory on the basis of said outside group being a different race from them. You cannot create an ethnostate from two groups of the same people fighting each other. Then it's just a power grab. The key component is race. And I said yes and no to the idea of Black people having a culture. Yes, that Black people are attempting to create a culture separate from Whiteness and White Supremacy, and no because Whiteness eventually co-opts whatever cultural aspects that are created by Black people and transforms them into objects which support the system of White Supremacy. Does that mean that Whiteness is a culture? No. It just means, like I wrote before, that Whiteness has the ability to change whatever it claims itself to be in order to uphold White Supremacy and achieve power. That it has no inherent culture or ethnic ties to any place unless it is to uphold White Supremacy. I tied identity to culture, history, and ethnic origin and call it a complex thing with good parts and bad parts. And as I wrote before and will write again, Whiteness has no real identity outside of maintaining and upholding White Supremacy for the sake of Whiteness. There is no history it respects or culture it adheres to unless it upholds White Supremacy. White people are not unique in seeking power, but the structures that have been created to uphold White Supremacy and the deliberate erasure of ethnic ties to their countries of origin for the sake of Whiteness are unique. And you're not going to get that from anyone else but White people and Whiteness. The only people who find the terms Whiteness and White Supremacy offensive are White people who don't want to say they participate in upholding White Supremacy but still want the benefits of the power from said structures. And Jewish people aren't really considered White by White people. >>194608 I never said that Minority rule is the same as Whiteness or that other Races can't hold minority rule. But if you mean minority groups within the same recognized racial group, then we're talking about something else. Something far closer to in-fighting than what White Supremacy is and has been for majority-White countries with a significant minority population. I feel like people are looking for some sort of "gotcha" moment when it comes to Whiteness. And it's not going to happen. Norwegians have a culture, British people have a culture, Italians have a culture, and Portuguese people have a culture. Every place that White people originated from has a culture. But Whiteness is not a culture. It gave up the cultural and ancestral ties it had to establish and maintain White Supremacy, and all it has left is money and power. I'd go as far as to say that White people do not consider themselves a race in the same way they consider other groups to be a race. And now White people are starting to actually want to be a race and have a culture that's unique to them and embrace their ancestral history beyond Whiteness and serving to uphold White Supremacy, and I'm for it. Give up the power and the structures which maintain that power and join the rest of the human race in the fight for survival on this miserable shithole.
>>194616 >And you're not going to get that from anyone else but White people and Whiteness. So you are a race realist. Please deny it now. I'm sure you'll claim it's some sort of social construct or something. My point about jewishnes has nothing to do with their ethnicity. It's about holding up a group as unduly bad and employing their label in the pejorative. You might claim that white people don't have a culture but all you do is continue to galvanise what already exists. Dismiss it as thin skinned or sensitive but this inevitably happens when you open a group up to criticism and rob them of recourse. Please continue. Do carry on using the words you do too. See if relations improve or decline. You might want this to happen but I don't think it will appear in the form you'll welcome. I certainly don't. The gotcha moment is your double standard. Treating races differently based on perceived inequities. "Why are you complaining when you have all the benefits of this system?" This claim is deafening but it's polar opposite to what I know to be true. There are no whites only vacancies in your white supremacy however there are plenty of "ethnic minority prefered" vacancies advertised. Illegal, yes but it's glossed over like most of these inconvenient truths. These are facts. Yes, put your thumb on the scale and see if it helps. I guarantee it won't. You think the people with the power won't dig their heels in if threatened? It might look all woke right now but those at the top aren't giving anything up anytime soon and we will suffer, not them.
ya'll are fucking faggots
Can we stop using dood links? It compresses the hell out of videos and takes quality away with it.
Someone need to hire me to go around & kill all off all racist white people in higher job positions. Being all my fucking guns.
>>195277 Can I hire you to unclog my shitter?
>>195277 Don’t forget to collect your welfare check when you’re on the way to kill taxpayers
>>195476 Right..... "taxpayers". Uhumm... You sure do a lot of talking for someone with SO MUCH MONEY!!!
>>195504 Fuck my bosses! One of them tried to put it up my ass for a job !!!!!
>>195608 Lawsuit.
>>302031 The US government is so incompetent that it can't even take care of a few domestic terrorists who retired too early from their jobs and have nothing better to do with their time! It gets them into trouble. One of these suspected fellows is from a Colombian family and they may not even be here legally, but although they may be undocumented immigrants they are resided in a near by house. Black and latino low income communities elderly population are the ones performing these acts of "Domestic Terrorism" suspectedly affiliated with the taliban AlQuaeda in carrying out the targeted harassment or stalking of other American citizens in these poor areas they live in. Targeting Americans to incite paranoia, sharing people's personal information around neighborhoods by communicating through subliminal messages and photographs, sometimes using different means to broadcast the information they gather through imageboards, social media, and even entertainment medias and video streams while remaining "hidden in plain sight". Let them die. They are ugly, stupid, evil and unAmerican.
>>302049 >This is why women shop on amazon. Cant even go to the store in peace lol That is correct. Mainly men go to stores rather than the lady of the house because they send their husbands to do the shopping, and I suspect it has something to do with this Domestic Terrorism that I have witnessed first hand. I am an ex-New York city cop, and my nephew told me today how some of the mob members that use these imageboards sites to share information about him in order to scare him have followed him around while shopping in local grocery stores and whispered things into his ear! He said they gave information about his photo ID, his appearance, and even what he wears when he is at a local mall. I believe they are trying to scare people but that is not all they are trying to do! They also use hackers and purchase/share personal to scare Americans when they stalk them! This is an attack on our democracy and our freedoms, and our laws! Parents be careful with these sites and instagram!
>>195947 Sure about? If that was the case apple and samsung would be suing for hacking their servers stfu,
>>195947 "I am an ex-new York cop". I think you spelled faggot wrong, shut your stupid ass up.
>>196316 Holy shit everybody get a load of this numbskull.
>>195947 Are they gonna back trace me? Hahaha my god.
>>196454 You're idiot >>196331 >I think you spelled faggot wrong Every fucking time I see somebody trying to help others I always see this word. What does it have to do whether he's a homosexual or not? He is saying that he is being followed or tracked in public and harassed by grocery shoppers who are not "FBI" who then share his private ID information on this site amongs other porno sites. What is so difficult to understand about that, and what does it have to do if he's a >faggot or not?
>>196487 The more plausible explanation would be that he's paranoid. Oh and a faggot.
>>196505 Do your research before you can somebody schizo. And mathematically it isn't very likely that he's homosexual either. Do terrorists, tyrannical governments, racism, antifa, etc, exist? Then don't get in his way when he's only trying to help other potential victims or whatever it is that is going on. You're an idiot and you should never procreate.
>>196511 And you're indulging an internet weirdo. Fucking autists.
Can I sue them for not putting me in the correct division knowing all my hours are in the division with the wages?
>>196539 If I dont get my money by monday im kicking in doors & walls bombshell
Lets remodel this place with our built up anger and frustration from those who abuse their power.
>>196542 You. Are. A. Fuck. Up.
>>196560 Welcome to bbw chan
>>196560 So all the fuck ups sit in the hallways ok make sense now. You guys can meep that feat. Been good over here. God bless america.
>>196577 That man probably achieved more than any of us ever would. I don't know what Italy means by terrorist though or like if he killed people or was just working agaibst the government. In the US the government calls you a terrorist even when they fuck up and you call it out that they are beholden to the constitution and that the people we as individuals have a duty to make sure that the hovernment follows the law of the constitution. Meanwhile there are actual criminals in the streets with databases of information on American civilians like if they were licensed invesrigators, American's information is being traded and sold "hidden in plain sight" on internet sites, Americans are stalked and harassed by retired senior citizens who keep records on them while trying to incite paranoia, and what has the US government done? Nothing. The US government is not helpful. They are a burden and are useless. They are a fucking joke and they violate anyone's privacy to suit their needs while doing nothing of value for us. Then thid man says "God bless America"? Does he even believe in God? Does he know who God is and is capable of doing to this country? He has no fear of God so he takes whatever isn't his, kills anybody in his way, and destroys things that he did not build. Pray for gorgiveness before it's too late. That's the only thing that you should be worried about.
>>196679 Dude, this fella is responsible for massacres, instigating murders and other chilling things. these mobsters are dogs raised on sticks, their life is "lived" in perpetual hiding, some lived in houses underground. with henchmen watching him 24h. I'd rather be a fat weabo than this shit. (im italian tho)
I worked non union for 14 years. Soon as I join a union work few years under their belt all of sudden I cant get work. Union is bullshit they hype you up when you get in and treat you like dog shit once ur in. I want all unions investigated
Thank you very much for all the videos!
>>197059 You're stupid and your dhit's garbage. I heard your dick it stinks.
>>197114 Sue your job for not allowing you enjoy full time employment, racism, favoritism, harassment, misleading, and sue them for just being pieces of shit,
>>197274 Sue them for manipulation of hiring process. Let me know if u need more ammo. - investigators building a case on your boss. Corruption 2023
>>168289 So how much is a Simp Card for a year? Asking for friends.
>>197859 Ok we all know they're narcissistic assholes who abuse thier position. And they will continue to be that way until the bigger boot steps in. Until then it will continue everywhere. Everywhere. end this debate bullshit tyrant rant chat we all know. Now enjoy the new year. Their time is coming to an end soon. Now delete this thread. Its irrelevant. For fuck sakes.
Pays yearly simp not to get any simp for schzios lol
Stfu nutter retards hate nutters non-retards hate nutters 2. nutters, are others, not us, nuts and terrorists get ground
Just tell me when. Ill make sure you all get work.
I want a break down on the price structure of rent, mortgage, phone bill, & consumer goods like food, furniture & clothes. I want a specific break down of each industry on their products on why they cost what they cost. And how we can adjust the cost. The prices are to high. The labor to make each product is atleast 80% cheaper then what its being sold for. This goes for all categories. Price of wood to build homes is cheap. But houses have a 50% increase in valuation of the last 3 years? Ridiculous. Rent? It steadily moves up each year? Why??? We need a bill set in place to reduce the cost of rent and keep it at a thresold. Office workers & property workers get paid like shit. So why the fuck is rent keep going up? OUTRAGEOUS! Fix it now. Food and other consumer goods! Price is to high! For the labor it cost to make each item. Fix it now. All these industries have one common problem. CEO's getting 1000% raises every year. So if u want to know why everything cost so much. Now you know. Because the workers never see the extra income. Hopefully this fix's some common problems starting today. All politicians see these. I control the world. And I approve this message. Get to work. Do your fucking job. Everyone is expungable. EVERYONE Sitting there with a big smile on your face because you are narcissistic evil. Got something for all of you this month if nothing start to change
An unrelated question, how do you improve your anonymity online? Any advice bros
>>198329 Get a large of people. Stay connected. Stay anon.
>>198329 The basics? Avoid google, amazon, apple and microsoft. Quit social media and ditch your phone.
>>198388 So live in the wilderness in an abandon schoolbus on top of some mountain then try to hike back to civilization?
>>198414 No you're right, it's not possible. Sorry guy, you're never be anon.
>>198414 If you find it impossible to do even that then you don't really deserve it.
>>198420 Guy who did it died trying to come back to his home town. Movie & book on it.
>>198433 Certainly didn't die of using an alternative search engine.
Your phone's audio is being monitored by the NSA and whether it is being revorded or not it us being listened to by humans. These humans then communicate your information to others by memorizing as much of your information as they can. Those "others" sell or share your information to criminals who use the information to target and harass civilians in an effort to spread paranoia. They also have "informants" who volunteer to apply at your local banks, and public facilities. The occasions that I have personally seen it happen they were of black and latina ethnicity and they were the 4 of them females, but I have reportedly heard about Jewish females being "informants". They use informants with photographic memory when they have ko other way to make copies of your info. Spread the words it's either the NSA has corruption or the phone manufacturer. Buy a phone with a microphone cutoff switch because they are listening and watching. Be careful about informants. Pay attention to newly employed personel. I have heard that this is their way of trying to push a NWO agenda of digital passports and digital currency for example through facial recognition. The spirit of the anti-Christ is here.
Tell those NSA perverts that I just had the best pork and scrambled eggs that I have ever had. Cooked to perfection. They're not getting the recipe.
Give me a heads up if you guys need help making video games
>>198435 most ip's got evaded on sesrch engines. Where have you been. Tell the judge make them show prove of call log. Since their isnt any work. Who are they calling and giving it too. Judge say to pay up.
>>198828 Who calls anyone anymore and who doesn't mask their IP? If you need a phone use a custom ROM and VOIP. For messaging use an and to end encrypted amnesic messenger. All contacts should be aliases and use burner accounts for everything. If possible use those once only. Email by it's nature is not secure regardless of what any company tells you.
>>198897 Or just met up tf
>>199021 >If you need a phone
>>76773 > I’m not saying I’m being ganstalked I’m not delusional You're not delusional. You're a stupid nutter. They are Domestic Terrorists that found your location and are coordinating attacks to scare you. They say they're only "trolling". It is possible that your phone is hacked, or websites you've visited got hacked, but other than websites selling your information to criminals and gangs most likely all they did was watch you. They watched you until they figured out a way to premeditate your location and find you to scare you. There are no such things as aliens. Aliens didn't travel millions of lightyears to get to Earth. These nutter scum of the Earth watch American citizens and keep a record of them. They sell/share information. They keep "folders" or profiles of American citizens, their online activities, and who knows what else. It is an organized, communal, international attack. They sabotage nations to try to get laws changed or passed. This is not all they do. Their connections or affiliates hack companies to steal their intellectual property, and are somehow complicit with groups such as "mob". Read the schizo threads.
>>199262 Read one? I'm in one.
Mods must hate gingers, any thread I make with a redhead gets deleted, even if there are plenty of pix or links. Screw this board.
>>199584 Gingers? I hate nutters. How many times have I said it today? I hate nutters
>>199746 You're fucking boring.
Dont talk to him bro. He smiles in your face. Then gas lights you. Narcissist tactic to make it seem like you're the problem. Everyone have the same words for him. (Them) they're jealous of you guys thats the reason not what u didnt do. Scared of your god given potential. Now u know. Dont laugh with those clowns. Better connections out there waiting for you guys. Oh lot more money
Lmao find out who is bidding work. game over
>>199866 See? Boring.
>>199875 You're welcome you boring, boring fuck hole.
>>199879 So articulate too. Can you wipe your own ass?
I said wipe. lol
>>199889 I'm gonna stop now. This seems kinda cruel .
>>199895 Echooooooooo!!
What?
I can confirm this because this is my experience. There was a public place that I used to visit. I visited this place randomly only a few times a year when I needed to read in quite. When I started noticing things in my life I began paying more attention, and the following time that I visited that place, right after I entered, behind me came in a group of individuals who appeared to not be together but were all dressed the same way I was dressed. That is the first time I noticed. I ignored them after that, but they persisted in their fear mongering around the places I frequented. They do it in subtle and distinct ways that most would not care to pay attention to or notice. It is without a doubt a cooperated act between an organized group that communicates and coordinates, and it couldn't be achieved any other way. It is a mob or group that targets individuals and stalks/harasses them.
>>199895 Dude I said all of that from your moms tablet. I smashed it. Now what? Oh? Ok normal life? Ok war no peace. Peace no war. U typed all of that & still dont have millions pathetic voter. 4 chan users be like
>>199966 But I literally didn't understand anything you said. Can you stop making silly jokes on this thread? It's a schizo thread for helping those in need.
>>199970 Help the minorities become executives. No more " we need more time" no more " it takes time" because for ur sisters husbands nephew. Job promotion without college dregee load of harvard. Big tits
>>199989 That's all that matters. Physical characteristics that were an accident of birth. We're truly in the company geniuses.
>>200126 If it aint white its an accident now? White ppl man. White ppl. Ignorant culture of ppl
>>200144 Is it not an accident of fate that a person also happens to be born white? You are obsessed with skin color and I put it to you that you are in fact the racist. No power/privilege prejudice mumbo jumbo. a dyed in the wool racist. Hate filled and truly ignorant.
>>200154 I'm in the tits section. Take your wildest guess.
>>200157 You might get some joy from someone in the booty thread. Butts are for shitting and sitting.
>>200160 No, I think I'll stay her and enjoy the tits. Not the butts.
The fun is at the elbows and armpits (shaved, no hippie stuff) too bad we don't have a board for that. This is the closest since most boob shot include armpits and elbows.
Let me find out unions dont give out jobs to working families anymore. The fuck are they getting paid for? At this point we as members can fight for our damn self. & as members vote the delegates out not standing up to their responsibilities. Theyre useless in 2023. There is always non union work going on. But unions never got work. Wonder why corrupts sons of bitchs hope they get bombed and murdered for being corrupt and sleeping in bed with all contractors world wide.
>>200286 Unions are useless if workers have to do it themselves. They find work on REPORT MY POSTsss or facebook groups. Because unions delegates are corrupt. Some companies hire their own ppl without telling unions in 2023 thats how bad it is out there
Damn ^^ you been exposed. 2023 said be good to people.
(506.85 KB 683x683 md.png)
>>200630 Brad Pitt. I really should workout more but I won't
>>200630 I bummed a pig once.
>>200736 We've all seen others bumming pigs on a drunken night out by the farm, but very few of us hve ever actually bummed a pig.
>>200293 If you ppl who are complaining was smart you guys would vote them the fuck out of office plain and simple. Coming here simping wont help. Yes more ppl will know but. vote them out or sue them the fuck.
>>200853 Honestly if any union is that corrupt your best bet is to go on your state website find out which contractor have all the work and take it from their. Your union is clearly useless they just collect pay checks do the bare minimum until they get voted out, murdered or commit suicide because no one wants their job.
Non union taking it all.
>>> >>71509 I have been "fighting this" since 2008, and although I still don't have proof, it was plenty of time to gather enough information because the internet had nothing to offer (something that I wasn't sure whether it was deliberate or not). Now out of all my questions only 1 question remains. Is it an AI listening to all phone calls and then sending messages on the internet and scaring people and even giving orders to scare people, or are there humans listening to all phone calls, and I hope to have my answer before the year is done. Maybe you don't think there's anything wrong with secretly listening to citizens phone calls or anytjing wrong with secret groups that are using tjis AI's information to stalk and harass American citizens, but I kniw that you are a fan of "logic", and I gotta tell you that logicly, the mathematical odds are that you are fucking up again, and that this eon't be the last. A government that lies and keeps secrets is no better than an enemy terrorist.

Delete
Report